Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Market Association Of Neeti Bagh ... vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi & Ors on 9 December, 2022

Author: Manoj Kumar Ohri

Bench: Manoj Kumar Ohri

                            $~27
                            *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                            +    W.P.(C) 11301/2015
                                 MARKET ASSOCIATION
                                 OF NEETI BAGH (REGD.)           ..... Petitioner
                                                  Through:

                                                      versus

                                  MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF
                                  DELHI & ORS                           ..... Respondents
                                               Through: Mr.Rajan Tyagi, Standing Counsel
                                                        with Ms.Vijeta Mukherjee, Advocate
                                                        for respondent No.1.
                                                        Mr.G.S.Oberoi, ASC with Ms.Devika
                                                        Mohan and Mr.Ankur Sharma,
                                                        Advocates for respondent No.2/DDA.
                                                        Mr.Aayush Agarwala and Mr.Auritro
                                                        Mukherjee, Advocates for
                                                        respondents No.4 and 5.


                                  CORAM:
                                  HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
                                               ORDER

% 09.12.2022 CM. APPL. 50950/2019

1. The present application has been filed on behalf of respondent Nos. 4 and 5 seeking stay of the communication dated 04.11.2019 stated to be issued by respondent No. 1 whereby the applicants' application seeking regularisation of gates installed in Neeti Bagh was rejected.

2. It is noted that the present writ petition initially came to be disposed of by this Court vide order dated 22.02.2019 whereafter the captioned application was filed.

Digitally Signed By:SANGEETA ANAND Signing Date:12.12.2022 14:08:50

3. Mr. Aayush Agarwala, learned counsel appearing for the applicants/respondent Nos. 4 and 5, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present application with liberty to file a fresh writ petition. He prays that protection granted on 26.11.2019, wherein statement was recorded on behalf of respondent No. 1 to the effect that no coercive action would be taken with respect to the gates in question, be continued for a period of four weeks to enable them to file a fresh writ petition.

4. Accordingly, it is directed that protection granted on 26.11.2019 which was extended from time to time, be continued for another period of six week from today.

5. The application stands disposed of in the above terms.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J DECEMBER 9, 2022/v Digitally Signed By:SANGEETA ANAND Signing Date:12.12.2022 14:08:50