Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Gauhati High Court

Sri Jatin Das vs The United Bank Of India Rep. By Its ... on 3 June, 2019

Author: Manish Choudhury

Bench: Manish Choudhury

                                                                    Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010117732019




                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                Case No. : I.A.(Civil) 1806/2019

            1:SRI JATIN DAS
            S/O- LATE BHARAT DAS, R/O- BORDHADUM,
            P.O. DANGARI, P.S. DOOMDOOMA, DIST.- TINSUKIA, ASSAM.

                              VERSUS

            1:THE UNITED BANK OF INDIA REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, 11, HEMANTA
            BASU SARANI, HEAD OFFICE- KOLKATA- 700001.

            2:THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
            PERSONAL AND SERVICES AND DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY
            UNITED BANK OF INDIA 11 HEMANTA BASU SARANI
            HEAD OFFICE- KOLKATA- 700001.

            3:THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER
            (CBG) AND APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNITED BANK OF INDIA 11
            HEMANTA BASU SARANI HEAD OFFICE- KOLKATA- 700001.

            4:THE GENERAL MANAGER RECOVERY AND REVIEWING AUTHORITY
            UNITED BANK OF INDIA 11 HEMANTA BASU SARANI HEAD OFFICE-
            KOLKATA- 700001.

            5:THE BRANCH MANAGER
            UNITED BANK OF INDIA DOOMDOOMA BRANCH
            P.O. AND P.S. DOOMDOOMA DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. T J MAHANTA

Advocate for the Respondent :

                                      BEFORE
                        HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING)
                      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
                                                                                       Page No.# 2/2

                                             ORDER

Date : 03-06-2019 [A.K. Goswami, CJ (Acting).] Heard Mr. T.J. Mahanta, learned senior counsel for the applicant. This is an application for condonation of delay of 11 days in preferring the connected appeal.

Issue notice to the respondents, returnable in 8(eight) weeks. Steps for service of notice on the respondents by registered post with A/D. Sd/- Sd/-

                JUDGE                             CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING)


M. Sharma




Comparing Assistant