Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court - Orders

Vikash Tobacco Factory vs Nagar Parishad Mahnar on 16 July, 2025

Author: Alok Kumar Sinha

Bench: Alok Kumar Sinha

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11243 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 Vikash Tobacco Factory Ward No. 5, Mahnar P.O. and P.S.-Mahnar, District-
                 Vaishali at Hajipur through its Proprietor Arun Kumar Jayaswal (male), aged
                 about 74 years, Son of Arjun Prasad Chaudhary, resident of Mahnar Main
                 Road (Near Jeep Stand), P.O. and P.S. Mahnar, District-Vaishali at Hajipur.

                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
           1.    Nagar Parishad Mahnar P.O. and P.S.-Mahnar, District-Vaishali at Hajipur
                 through the Chief Councilor.
           2.    The Chief Councilor-cum-Chairman of Municipal Board, Nagar Parishad
                 Mahnar, P.O. and P.S.-Mahnar, District-Vaishali at Hajipur.
           3.    The Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad Mahnar, P.O. and P.S.-Mahnar,
                 District-Vaishali at Hajipur.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :     Mr.Awnish Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :     Mr.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   16-07-2025

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in this application, the petitioner has challenged the order/notice dated 09.05.2025, contained in Letter No. 562 issued under the signature of Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Mahnar (respondent no. 3). It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that while the above document is labeled as a notice, however, it directs the petitioner to move/shift his Tobacco Factory or else appropriate steps/proceeding would be initiated against him.

3. It is a categorical case of the petitioner that contrary Patna High Court CWJC No.11243 of 2025(2) dt.16-07-2025 2/2 to the provision contained in Sections 33 and 41 of the Bihar Municipal Act, 2007, no notice was issued to him and the instant notice is, in fact, an order/direction for him to move his factory.

4. Issue notice to respondents by both the modes i.e. ordinary as well as registered post with A/D, for which necessary requisite(s) must be filed by the petitioner within four weeks from today failing which the writ application shall stand dismissed.

5. In view of the aforesaid facts, it is directed that during the pendency of this application, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner, pursuant to the aforesaid notice dated 09.05.2025 (Annexure-P/6).

6. Put up this case on 01.09.2025 on service of notice or on appearance of respondents, whichever is earlier.

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J) Saurav/-

U