Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 3]

Supreme Court of India

Amar Nath Neogi vs The State Of Jharkhand on 10 October, 2017

Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2018 SC 507, AIRONLINE 2017 SC 79

Author: Kurian Joseph

Bench: R. Banumathi, Kurian Joseph

                                                                                              NON-REPORTABLE
                                            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                           CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                      CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1758 OF 2017
                              [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL) NOS. 7487/2017]


                         AMAR NATH NEOGI                                               APPELLANT(S)

                                                                 VERSUS

                         STATE OF JHARKHAND                                            RESPONDENT(S)

                                                       J U D G M E N T

KURIAN, J.

Leave granted.

2. The appellant is an accused in Case No.680/2015 corresponding to G.R. NO.4839/2015 under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the I.P.C. We are informed that the investigation has already been completed. We also found from the records that the appellant is a senior citizen, having crossed the age of 65 years. We are also informed that he was never in Government service. We fail to understand as to why the appellant prayed for anticipatory bail in a case where final report has been filed.

3. In the above circumstances, we dispose of this appeal as follows:

The appellant shall surrender before the Court of competent jurisdiction where the final report has been filed, within two weeks from today.
On such surrender, the appellant shall be released on bail on his executing a bond to the tune of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Signature Not Verified Thousand) with two solvent sureties to the Digitally signed by NARENDRA PRASAD Date: 2017.10.26 16:13:03 IST equal amount.
Reason:

4. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of.

1

5. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

6. There shall be no orders as to costs.

.......................J. [KURIAN JOSEPH] .......................J. [R. BANUMATHI] NEW DELHI;

OCTOBER 10, 2017.

2