Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 8, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Riddisiddhi Buillions Limited vs The Assistant Commissioner(Ct) on 28 August, 2024

Author: R. Suresh Kumar

Bench: R. Suresh Kumar, C. Saravanan

                                                                W.P.Nos.22567 & 22568 of 2015



                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                              DATED: 28.08.2024

                                                  CORAM :
                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR
                                                     AND
                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN

                                         W.P.Nos.22567 & 22568 of 2015

                     Riddisiddhi Buillions Limited
                     (Rep. by its Vice President Mahendra Bafna)
                     No.780, Mettupalayam Road, R.S.Puram
                     Coimbatore-641 002.               ..   Petitioner in both W.Ps

                                                     Vs.
                     1. The Assistant Commissioner(CT)
                        R.S.Puram (East) Circle, Coimbatore.

                     2. The State of Tamil Nadu
                        Rep. by its Secretary, CT & RE Department
                        Fort St. George
                        Chennai-600 009.               ..    Respondents in both W.Ps

                     Prayer in W.P.No.22567 of 2015: Petition filed under Article 226 of
                     the Constitution of India, seeking for a writ of certiorari, to call for
                     the records on the files of the First respondent herein in
                     TIN:33941942399/2013-14 dated 17.12.2014 and quash the same
                     in so far as it has ordered reversal of input tax credit of
                     Rs.42,04,277/-;

                     Prayer in W.P.No.22568 of 2015: Petition filed under Article 226 of
                     the Constitution of India, seeking for a writ of declaration,
                     declaring Section 19(2)(ii) and Section 19(4)(i) of the Tamil Nadu
                     Value Added Tax Act, 2006 as discriminatory and violative of
                     Articles 14, 301 and 304(a) of the Constitution of India 1950, and
                     not saved by Presidential Assent under Article 304(b) of the
                     Constitution of India 1950 and in any view section 19(4) of the
                     Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 as inapplicable to cases
                     involving stock transfer of raw materials to a place outside the
                     state of Tamil Nadu for manufacture and return of the
                     manufactured goods inside the State of Tamil Nadu for sales within

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     Page 1 of 4
                                                                   W.P.Nos.22567 & 22568 of 2015



                     the State of Tamil Nadu.

                                  For the Petitioner
                                  in both W.Ps          :     Mr.K.A.Parthasarathi
                                                              for Mr.N.Inbarajan

                                  For the Respondents
                                  in both W.Ps          :     Mr.C.Harsharaj
                                                              Additional Government Pleader



                                                      COMMON ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.) Since the issue raised in W.P.No.22568 of 2015 is covered by the decision of a Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Patina Gold Ornaments Pvt. Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner (CT) and Anr1 dated 22.09.2017, W.P.No.22568 of 2015 is to be allowed.

2. As a consequential action, the impugned assessment order in W.P.No.22567 of 2015 dated 17.12.2014 is to be set aside.

Accordingly, the same is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the Assessing Authority for reassessment and to proceed in accordance with law, in light of the decision made in Patina Gold Ornaments Pvt. Ltd. cited supra.

1 [2018] 50 GSTR 114 (Mad) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 2 of 4 W.P.Nos.22567 & 22568 of 2015

3. Accordingly, both these writ petitions stand disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

                                                               (R.S.K., J.)          (C.S.N, J)
                                                                           28.08.2024

                     Neutral Citation:Yes/No

                     drm


                     To:

1. The Assistant Commissioner(CT) R.S.Puram (East) Circle, Coimbatore.

2. The Secretary, The State of Tamil Nadu CT & RE Department, Fort St. George Chennai-600 009.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 3 of 4 W.P.Nos.22567 & 22568 of 2015 R. SURESH KUMAR, J.

AND C. SARAVANAN, J.

(drm) W.P.Nos.22567 & 22568 of 2015 28.08.2024 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 4 of 4