Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 5]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Maman Singh & Ors vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 7 August, 2015

Author: Amit Rawal

Bench: Amit Rawal

                                                             ARCHANA ARORA
CWP No. 15548 of 2015                         1              2015.08.10 13:19
                                                             I attest to the accuracy and
                                                             authenticity of this document



IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH

                                  CWP No. 15548 of 2015
                             Date of decision August 7, 2015

Maman Singh and others
                                              ....... Petitioners
                             Versus


State of Haryana and others
                                              ........ Respondents

CORAM:            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:-         Mr. Rakesh Nagpal, Advocate
                  for the petitioners.



                       ****
                  1.   Whether reporters of local papers may be
                       allowed to see the judgment ?
                  2.   To be referred to the reporters or not?
                  3.   Whether the judgment should be reported in
                       the digest?

AMIT RAWAL, J (ORAL).

Learned counsel for the petitioners confines his prayer in the present writ petition for appropriate directions to respondent No.2 to decide the legal notice (Annexures P-4).

The present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Haryana Van Bhawan-respondent No.2 to consider the legal notice (Annexure P-4) and take appropriate decision in accordance with law preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

In case the claim of the petitioner is accepted then consequential benefits, if any, be given to the petitioner within a CWP No. 15548 of 2015 2 further period of two months. In case the respondents do not grant any relief then a well reasoned and speaking order be passed and conveyed to the petitioner.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE August 7, 2015 archana