Calcutta High Court
Ram Sundar Karmokar vs Sheikh Lochan on 20 November, 1916
Equivalent citations: 38IND. CAS.942, AIR 1917 CALCUTTA 613(2)
JUDGMENT
1. We are of opinion that the learned Subordinate Judge is right in holding that an occupancy holding not transferable by custom or usage cannot be sold in execution of a money-decree when the raiyat objects to the sale. The same view was taken in an unreported case, Appeal from Order No. 412 of 1915 [Narayani v. Nabin Chandra Chowdhari 36 Ind. Cas. 803 : 21 C.W.N. 403]; and we see no reason to differ from the view taken in that case. The Rule is accordingly discharged.