Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 1]

Orissa High Court

M/S. Bansapani Iron Ltd vs State Of Odisha .... Opposite Party on 6 December, 2022

Author: M.S. Raman

Bench: M.S. Raman

                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                                STREV No.105 of 2014

            M/s. Bansapani Iron Ltd.                   ....            Petitioner
                                         Mr. S.P. Dalai, Advocate on behalf of
                                                      Mr. P.K. Jena, Advocate
                                         -versus-
            State of Odisha                            ....       Opposite Party
                                                      Mr. S.K. Pradhan, A.S.C.
              CORAM:
              THE CHIEF JUSTICE
              JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN

                                         ORDER

Order No. 06.12.2022

06. 1. While admitting the present petition on 8th September 2015, the following question was framed:

"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in confirming the imposition of maximum penalty by the forums below relying on the ratio of the decision rendered in the case of Jindal Stainless Ltd. v. State of Orissa (2012) 54 VST 1 (Ori) without taking into consideration the decision relied on by the Petitioner rendered in the case of Union of India v. Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills (2010) 1 GSTR 66 (SC) 2009 (238) ELT 3 (SC) which has been relied on by the Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of C.Ex., Chandigarh v. Pepsi Foods Ltd. 2010 (260) ELT 481 (SC)."

2. In view of the decision of this Court dated 5th July 2022 in STREV No.69 of 2012 (State of Odisha v. M/s Chandrakanta Jayantilal, Cuttack), the said question is answered in the Page 1 of 2 affirmative i.e., in favour of the Department and against the Petitioner-Assessee.

3. The revision petition is accordingly dismissed.

(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (M.S. Raman) Judge S.K. Guin Page 2 of 2