Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

M/S Nikku Ram & Company vs Oic on 6 March, 2017

Daily Order 2nd Additional Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH.

 

Execution Application No.72 of 2016   In/and Consumer Complaint No.147 of 2014         Date of institution: 25.05.2016    Date of Decision  :  06.03.2017   M/s Nikku Ram & Company through its Partner Mr. Anish Gupta, F-19/49, Sector 8, Rohini, Delhi-110085.

                                                                             .... Applicant/Decree Holder Versus The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Through its Branch Manager, Branch Office, Pheruman Chowk, Kotkapura, Near Old Grain Market, Kotkapura, District Faridkot (Punjab) 151204. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited through its Regional Manager, Surendra Building, SCO No.109-110-111, Sector 17-D.                                                               ....Opposite Parties/JDs      Application under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act.

Before:-

          Hon'ble Mr. Justice Paramjeet Singh Dhaliwal, President           Shri Gurcharan Singh Saran, Judicial Member                    Present:-
For the decree holder      :         Sh.Munish Goel, Advocate For JDs                          :         Sh. Ram Avtar, Advocate            JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH DHALIWAL, PRESIDENT Order                      Learned counsel for the applicant-complainant-DH has made a statement separately that he has been informed by the applicant-complainant-DH that he has received the payment from respondent-opposite parties-JDs. He further submits that he is not sure, whether the complete payment has been made and that liberty may be granted to him to move fresh application in case there is any deficiency in payment. Learned counsel for the JDs has stated that they had already paid the due amount.
                        In view of this the execution application is dismissed as infractuous. However, if there is any discrepancy in payment the applicant/DH has liberty to file the fresh application.
                                                                                        
(JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH DHALIWAL)                                                                                                               PRESIDENT                                                               (GURCHARAN SINGH SARAN)                                                                      JUDICIAL MEMBER   March 06, 2017 PK/-