Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Surinder Pal vs Pswc And Anr on 3 February, 2017

Author: Jaswant Singh

Bench: Jaswant Singh

   CWP 1989 of 2017                            1                                121

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                           AT CHANDIGARH



                                                     Date of Decision: 03/02/2017


   Surinder Pal
                                                                  ......... Petitioner
                                            Versus


   The Punjab State Warehousing Corporation and another
                                                               ......... Respondents

   CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH


   Present:    Mr.JP Rana, Advocate for the petitioner.

                                   ****

   JASWANT SINGH, J. (Oral)

The petitioner, while working as Godown Attendant at State Warehouse,Budhlada with the Punjab State Warehousing Corporation, was charge-sheeted vide memo dated 15.9.2011 (Annexure P-1) relating to causing loss on account of shortage of rice stock and shortage during the upgradation of stocks. The Punishing Authority, vide order dated 12.7.2016 (Annexure P-4) has ordered a recovery of a sum of Rs.74,45,528/- pursuant to the charge-sheet. The petitioner is stated to have filed a statutory appeal dated 9.8.2016 (Annexure P-5) before the Appellate Authority.

Although the prayer is for quashing of the order dated 12.7.2016 (Annexure P-4), however, an alternative prayer has been made for issuance of a direction to the Appellate Authority to decide the statutory appeal (P-5) within time frame.

For Subsequent orders see CWP-1990-2017, CWP-1991-2017, -- and 1 more.

1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 12-02-2017 07:51:51 ::: CWP 1989 of 2017 2 121 Learned Counsel for the petitioner, at the time of arguments, has restricted his prayer for the aforesaid alternative prayer.

Keeping in view the limited prayer of learned Counsel for the petitioner, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the Appellate Authority (respondent No.2) to decide the statutory appeal dated 9.8.2016 (P-5) within a period of six months from the receipt of certified copy of this order.

Disposed of accordingly.

   03/02/2017                                            (JASWANT SINGH)
   joshi                                                     JUDGE


                       Whether speaking/reasoned       Yes
                           Whether Reportable           No




For Subsequent orders see CWP-1990-2017, CWP-1991-2017, -- and 1 more.

2 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 12-02-2017 07:51:52 :::