Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

Ravi Venkata Satya Sai Bobbili, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 23 April, 2024

Author: K. Sreenivasa Reddy

Bench: K Sreenivasa Reddy

APHC010185152024
                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
                                  PRADESH
                                                        [3327]
                               AT AMARAVATI
                        (Special Original Jurisdiction)

      TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL
         TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

                   PRESENT
 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY

            CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2670/2024

Between:
Ravi Venkata Satya Sai Bobbili,  ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)
and Others
                             AND

The State Of Andhra        ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S)
Pradesh and Others

Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
  1. M R K CHAKRAVARTHY

Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
  1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)


The Court made the following:
                                   2




         HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY

               Criminal Petition No.2670 of 2024
Order:

      This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has been

filed on behalf of the petitioners/A-2 to A-4, to quash the

proceedings in Crime No.268 of 2024 of Sarpavaram Police

Station, Kakinada district, registered for the offences punishable

under Section 498-A read with 34 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of

the Dowry Prohibition Act.


2.    Learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing for some

time, has confined his argument to the extent of protecting the

petitioners herein from the police.


3.    On the other hand, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor

contended that specific accusations have been made as against

the petitioners herein and truth or otherwise of the said

accusations has to be gone into by the investigating agency.


4.    Heard. Perused the record.


5.    Since the accusations that have been made in the FIR as

against the petitioners herein can be gone into by the
                                  3



investigating agency, this Court, in a petition filed under Section

482 Cr.P.C., would not be in a position to go into the disputed

questions of fact and quash the proceedings at this stage.


6.    In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the

case, this Court is not inclined to quash the proceedings against

the petitioners herein.     However, the police concerned are

directed to conduct investigation without taking any coercive

steps against the petitioners herein/A-2 to A-4.


7.    Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.


8.    As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any,

pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.


                                     _________________________
                                       K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J.

Date:23.04.2024 Nsr 4 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Criminal Petition No.2670 of 2024 Date:23.04.2024 Nsr