Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 9]

Chattisgarh High Court

Raj Kumar Mishra vs State Of Chhattisagarh 23 Revp/24/2019 ... on 12 March, 2019

Bench: Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Parth Prateem Sahu

                                                     1


                                                                                        NAFR
                           HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
                                           REVP No. 22 of 2019
                Raj Kumar Mishra, S/o Late Ganesh Prasad Mishra, aged about 48 years, R/o
                 Haldibadi, Chirmiri, Police Station Chirmiri, Tahsil Khadgawan, District Koriya
                 (C.G.) email - [email protected], Mo. No. 7999393315, w.app 9406363699.

                                                                                 ---- Petitioner

                                                 Versus

               1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of General
                  Administration, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh
                  email - [email protected], Mo.No. 9479003180

               2. Superintendent of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau, Civil Line, Near Rajbhawan,
                  Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Email - [email protected], Mo. No. 9425501902.

                                                                              ---- Respondents
        For Petitioner               :     In person.
        For Respondent/State         :     Shri Siddharth Dubey, Deputy Government Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order on Board Per Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice 12.03.2019

1. Heard Petitioner in person and learned Deputy Government Advocate for the State.

2. Perused the order dated 22.11.2018. In absence of any error apparent on the face of record, we do not feel that any interference is warranted in the said order.

3. In view of the same, review application stands dismissed.

                            Sd/-                                              Sd/-

                  (Ajay Kumar Tripathi)                              (Parth Prateem Sahu)
                      Chief Justice                                         Judge
   Brijmohan