Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Gujarat High Court

Ashwinbhai Manilal Patel vs State Of Gujarat & on 8 July, 2014

Author: S.G.Shah

Bench: S.G.Shah

           R/CR.RA/318/2014                                          ORDER



        IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
  CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (AGAINST ORDER PASSED BY
              SUBORDINATE COURT) NO. 318 of 2014
===========================================================
             ASHWINBHAI MANILAL PATEL....Applicant(s)
                            Versus
              STATE OF GUJARAT & 1....Respondent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR MITESH R AMIN, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR BP MUNSHI, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MS JD JHAVERI, ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================================
          CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.G.SHAH
                       Date : 08/07/2014
                                   ORAL ORDER
[1]    Heard learned counsel for the parties.


[2]    Considering   the   facts   and   circumstances   of   the   present   case, 

though so many things can be recollected and recorded, at present, the  issue is limited to the point that petitioner is challenging the condition  no.1 in  the  order dated 29.5.2014  by the  6th  (Ad­hoc) Addl. Sessions  Judge,   Ahmedabad   (Rural),   Ahmedabad,   passed   in   Criminal   Misc.  Application   no.515   of   2014,   whereby,   though   permission   to   travel  outside   India   was   granted,   petitioner   is   directed   to   deposit  Rs.10,72,000/­ (Rupees ten lacs seventy two thousand only).

[3] In compliance of order dated 11.06.2014, petitioner has already  deposited Rs.2,00,000/­ (Rupees two lacs only). Receipt of such deposit  is   produced   at   Exh.46.   At   present,   without   entering   into   merits   and  demerits of the case, it would be appropriate to modify the order dated  29.5.2014 by the 6th (Ad­hoc) Addl. Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural),  Ahmedabad, passed in Criminal Misc. Application no.515 of 2014 with  Page 1 of 2 R/CR.RA/318/2014 ORDER following conditions:­ [a] Petitioner is permitted to travel United States of America  for two  months  from the date of actual travel  on condition  to  deposit  additional  amount  of Rs.3,00,000/­  (Rupees  three  lacs  only) before the trial Court,  within a week.

[b] Thereby, petitioner shall disclose the actual date of travel  before   the   trial   Court  and   shall   surrender   his   passport   within  seven days after returning back from United States of America.

[c] Petitioner   has   to   disclose   his   itinerary   before   the   trial  Court.

[d] The   amount   of   deposit   pursuant   to   this   order   shall   be  invested in fixed deposit so as to earn interest.

[e] When   petitioner   surrenders   the   passport   back   after  returning   back   from   United   States   of   America,   the   amount   of  deposit with accrued interest shall be paid to him against proper  acknowledgment   in   accordance   with   the   rules.   Petitioner   may  seek such refund immediately after returning from United States  of America or on the date of maturing of such F.D.R.   [4] With the above observations, present petition stands disposed of.  Rule   is   made   absolute   to   the   aforesaid   extent.  Direct   service  is  permitted. 

(S.G.SHAH, J.) VATSAL Page 2 of 2