Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

All India Rms And Mms Employees Union vs The Chief Post Master General on 23 January, 2017

Author: T.Raja

Bench: T.Raja

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED  :  23.01.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA

W.P.No.1591 of 2017 

All India RMS and MMS Employees Union
Group C Tamilnadu Circle
represented by its Secretary K.Ramesh
Chennai 600 083				..	Petitioner 

-vs-

1. The Chief Post Master General 
    Tamilnadu Circle
    Anna Salai
    Chennai 600 002

2. The General Secretary
    All India RMS and MMS Employees Union 
        Group C CHQ
    17/4C, P & T Colony
    Kalibarimarg, NEPE, R-3
    New Delhi 110 001	   		..	Respondents

	Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent herein to consider the representation dated 22.12.2016 and accord Trade Union facilities to the Petitioner Union in accordance with law. 

		For Petitioner	::      Mr.G.Mohanakrishnan


ORDER

This writ petition has been filed by All India RMS & MMS Employees Union, Group C Tamilnadu Circle represented by its Secretary, Chennai. It is the claim of the petitioner that he has been elected as the Circle Secretary of AIRMS & MMS E.U Group C Tamilnadu Circle in the 31st circle conference held on 16.12.2016 and 17.12.2016 at Chennai; that the election of office bearers was communicated to the first respondent, namely, the Chief Post Master General, Tamilnadu Circle, Chennai on 19.12.2016. This was informed to the General Secretary, All India RMS & MMS Employees Union Group C CHQ. Subsequently, on 22.12.2016, the petitioner received a letter from the first respondent stating that the second respondent has requested the first respondent not to extend any trade union facilities to the petitioner Union. Immediately a letter was sent by the petitioner on 22.12.2016 informing the first respondent that the election of office bearers is only in accordance with the constitution and the bye-laws of the union. In the circumstances the petitioner, anticipating no improvement, has come to this Court seeking a direction to the first respondent to consider his representation dated 22.12.2016 and accord trade union facilities to the petitioner union in accordance with law.

2. But this Court may not be in a position to entertain the writ petition. The reason is that when the petitioner claims to have been elected as the Circle Secretary of the All India RMS & MMS Employees Union, Group-C, Tamilnadu Circle in the 31st circle conference held on 16.12.2016 and 17.12.2016 at Chennai and the election of office bearers was also communicated to the first respondent on 19.12.2016, informing the same to the second respondent, the first respondent has to take a decision on the grant of approval to the election of office bearers and also the election of the petitioner to the post of Circle Secretary of All India RMS & MMS Employees Union, Group-C, Tamilnadu Circle. Therefore, without a decision being taken on the extension of approval to the petitioner union, he cannot come to this Court seeking for a writ of mandamus or direction to the first respondent to consider his representation dated 22.12.2016 so as to accord the trade union facilities to the petitioner union. Moreover, a perusal of the proceeding dated 22.12.2016 issued by the Assistant Director (Admin/SR & WLF), Office of the Chief Postmaster General, Tamilnadu Circle shows that the General Secretary of AIRMS & MMS E.U.Gr.-C in his letter dated 19.12.2016 has requested the first respondent not to extend the trade union facilities to any list of office bearers purported to have been elected in the 31st Circle Conference until the CHQ completes its organizational enquiry and the decision of the CHQ is communicated. Therefore, unless that order is challenged successfully by the petitioner, a direction to the first respondent to accord or extend the trade union facilities to the petitioner is quite impossible. Hence, this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition fails and it is dismissed.

Index   : yes/no					       23.01.2017

ss


To

1. The Chief Post Master General 
    Tamilnadu Circle
    Anna Salai
    Chennai 600 002
T.RAJA, J.

ss








W.P.No.1591 of 2017








23.01.2017

http://www.judis.nic.in