Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M.Jeyasingh vs The District Collector on 24 January, 2017

Bench: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, M.Sundar

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :  24.01.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR

W.P.Nos.1699 of 2017
and
W.M.P.Nos.1669 & 1670 of 2017

M.Jeyasingh						.. Petitioner 
								

Vs.

1.  The District Collector,                
     Chengalpattu,
     Kancheepuram District.

2.  The Tahsildar,
     Chengalpattu Taluk,  
     Kancheepuram District.

3.  The Revenue Inspector, 
     Vandalur Sub Division,  
     Chengalpattu,  
     Kancheepuram District.				.. Respondents 
								
				
PRAYER : Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the Order of the 1st respondent in Na.Ka.No.9648/ 2016/Aa1, dated 05.01.2017 confirming the Notice of the 2nd  Respondent dated 09.12.2016 under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 and the Notice of the 3rd Respondent dated 24.11.2016 under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act  1905  insofar as the land and house situated at Old No.199, New No.5, Thiruvalluvar Nagar in S.No.164 C,  Rathinamangalam Village, Chengalpattu Taluk, Kancheepuram District admeasuring 3 Cents is concerned and quash the same.

For Petitioner
:
Mr.C.K.M.Appaji

For Respondents 
:
Mr.T.N.Rajagopalan
Spl. Government Pleader 

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) On our query, it is conceded that the area in question in respect of which notices were issued under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 and then under Section 6 of the said Act and the appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed on 5.1.2017, is categorized in the revenue records as water area.

2. In view of the Full Bench judgment of this Court in T.K.Shanmugam v. The State of Tamil Nadu, 2015 WLR 1029, neither can the revenue entries be changed nor the petitioner can have a right to continue to occupy water areas.

3. In view thereof, no infirmity can be found with the impugned order.

4. The writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, W.M.P.Nos.1669 & 1670 of 2017 are closed.

(S.K.K., CJ.)     (M.S., J.)
														      24.01.2017
Index		:	Yes/No
Internet	:	Yes
bbr

To:

1.  The District Collector                
     Chengalpattu,
     Kancheepuram District.
2.  The Tahsildar 
     Chengalpattu Taluk  
     Kancheepuram District.
3.  The Revenue Inspector 
     Vandalur Sub Division  
     Chengalpattu  
     Kancheepuram District.

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
M.SUNDAR,J.

bbr
















W.P.No.1699 of 2017

















24.1.2017

http://www.judis.nic.in