Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 11, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Hemakanti Devi vs The State Of Assam on 16 December, 2021

Author: Ajit Borthakur

Bench: Ajit Borthakur

                                                                       Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010179572021




                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                  Case No. : AB/3637/2021

            HEMAKANTI DEVI
            W/O LATE MANGAL SINGH NATH
            R/O MATHARBORI
            P.O. RAMJUNGATI, P.S.RAHA
            DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN-782103


            VERSUS

            THE STATE OF ASSAM
            REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM


Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. P K MAZUMDAR

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM


                                   BEFORE
                     HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR

                                          ORDER

16.12.2021 Heard Mr. P.K. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K.K. Parasar, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam appearing for the State respondent.

This petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C., is filed for granting the privilege of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, namely Hemakanti Devi, apprehending arrest Page No.# 2/2 in connection with Raha P.S. Case No. 300/2021 registered u/s 494/326/307/202/506/447/354/509/382/34 of the IPC.

The Case diary, as called for, is placed before the Court.

It may be mentioned that by order, dated 08.11.2021, this Court granted the privilege of interim pre-arrest bail to the petitioner subject to conditions.

Perusal of the case diary reveals no prima facie sufficient incriminating material against the petitioner, who is aged about 63 years old, requiring his custodial interrogation. In terms of the interim pre-arrest bail granted earlier, the petitioner has appeared before the I.O. and got his statement recorded u/s 161 Cr.P.C.

Therefore, the interim pre-arrest bail granted vide order, dated 08.11.2021 is hereby made absolute, subject to the following conditions-

(i) That the petitioner shall co-operate in investigation as and when required; and
(ii) That the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.

Return the case diary.

This disposes of the anticipatory bail application.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant