Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

Balaram Choudhury vs Indian Bank on 16 August, 2023

Author: S.K. Panigrahi

Bench: S.K. Panigrahi

                                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                                                   W.P.(C) No. 26178 of 2023

                                       Balaram Choudhury                        ....              Petitioner

                                                                                   Mrs. Sr. Pami Rath, Adv.
                                                                         along with Ms. Guman Singh, Adv.

                                                                     -versus-
                                       Indian Bank, Bhubaneswar                 ....      Opposite Parties
                                                                                      Mr. Tuna Sahu, Adv.
                                                                                                 For Bank




                                               CORAM:
                                               DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
                            Order                             ORDER
                            No.                              16.08.2023

01 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the Bank.

3. The Petitioner has filed this Writ Petition challenging the notice issued to the dated 05.08.2023 at Annexure-2 and return the title deeds of the Petitioner.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the wife of the petitioner namely, Saswati Choudhury has a separate business with one Mrs. Anita Dutta under the partnership Firm namely, M/s Koshis. In the said partnership firm the Petitioner has no business interest nor has any kind of financial relation. The said partnership firm appears to have availed some loan from the opposite party Bank which the Petitioner is no way concerned or connected with. The Page 1 of 2 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: LINGARAJ BEHERA Designation: Sr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 23-Aug-2023 19:10:24 // 2 // Petitioner has not offered any property or any personal guarantee for the said loan i.e. to M/s Koshis. In short, the petitioner has no link with the said loan arrangements even though his wife is a partner in the said firm. But the opposite party/Bank has issued notice to the petitioner stating that the partnership firm of his wife has availed as OCC loan facility for Rs.20,00,000/- and a a term loan of Rs.30,00,000/- on 06.02.2018. The status of loan account is also shown as NPA as on 05.08.2023.

4. In such view of the matter issue notice to the opposite party.

5. Mr.Tuna Sahu, learned counsel who usually appears for the Bank is present in the Court. Hence, this Court direct him to accept notice on behalf of the opposite party/Indian Bank.

6. List this matter on 22nd August, 2023. I.A. No.12508 of 2023

7. As an interim measure, the opposite party/Bank is directed not to take any coercive action on the basis of notice dated 05.08.2023 under Annexure-1 till the next date.

(Dr. S.K. Panigrahi) Judge LB Page 2 of 2 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: LINGARAJ BEHERA Designation: Sr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 23-Aug-2023 19:10:24