Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Panna Lal vs Apoorv Devgan & Ors on 10 April, 2025

Author: Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench: Jyotsna Rewal Dua

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
                         SHIMLA

                                                   COPC No. 306/2025
                                                   Decided on: 10.04.2025

Panna Lal                                                          ...Petitioner.

                                   Versus

Apoorv Devgan & Ors.                  ....Respondents.
..........................................................................................
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1

For the petitioners:              Mr. Mohar Singh, Advocate.

For the respondents:              Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate
                                  General.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.

The petitioner alleged violation of the direction issued in Panna Lal Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2

2. Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record copy of instructions memo dated 09.04.2025 from the Deputy Commissioner, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P., relevant portion of which read as under:-

"It is further submitted that respondent No.2, in turn, forwarded the said order to respondent No.3 on 28.11.2024. In pursuance thereof, a warrant of ejectment was issued on 10.12.2024 and the ejectment was duly carried out on 24.12.2024. The petitioner was duly associated and informed on the said date during the execution 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
CWP No. 11095/2024 decided on 30.09.2024 of the ejectment proceedings. Accordingly, it is submitted that the directions contained in the aforesaid order of the Hon'ble High Court have been complied with in letter and spirit."

3. In view of above, the present proceedings are closed as the respondents have implemented the judgment in question. It is for the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, in accordance with law, in case he still feels aggrieved. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge April 10, 2025(rohit)