Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax I vs M/S Goenka Jewellers 401 Panchratna Msb ... on 6 July, 2018

Bench: Rohinton Fali Nariman, Indu Malhotra

                                                 1



     ITEM NO.34 +63                        COURT NO.9                SECTION XV

                              S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                                      RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 20965/2018

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24-08-2017
     in DBITA No. 66/2016 passed by the High Court Of Judicature For
     Rajasthan At Jaipur)

     PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX I                          Petitioner(s)

                                                VERSUS

     M/S GOENKA JEWELLERS 401 PANCHRATNA MSB KA RASTA JAIPUR
                                                       Respondent(s)

     (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.82768/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY
     IN FILING    )

     with

     Diary No. 22666 of 2018
     (IA No. 86250 of 2018-c/delay in filing SLP)


     Date : 06-07-2018 These petitions were called on for hearing today.


     CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
                         HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA


     For Petitioner(s)             Mr. Maninder Singh, ASG,
                                   Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Adv.
                                   Ms. Liz Mathew, Adv.
                                   Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR

     For Respondent(s)


                         UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
Signature Not Verified
                                            O R D E R

Digitally signed by SHASHI SAREEN Date: 2018.07.07 10:51:27 IST Reason: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

Delay condoned.

We do not find any merit in these petitions. The Special 2 Leave Petitions are, accordingly, dismissed. However, the question of law as to Section 10 AA of the Income-Tax Act not referring to trading but only manufacture as a service is left open.

Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.





(SHASHI SAREEN)                                 (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR)
  AR CUM PS                                       BRANCH OFFICER