Punjab-Haryana High Court
Sukhwinder Singh @ Kaka vs State Of Punjab & Another on 18 July, 2012
Author: M.M.S. Bedi
Bench: M.M.S. Bedi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Criminal Miscellaneous No.M-14023 of 2012
Date of Decision: July 18, 2012
Sukhwinder Singh @ Kaka
..... PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Punjab & another
..... RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
. . .
PRESENT: - Mr. B.P.S. Virk, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Abhishek Chautala, Assistant Advocate
General, Punjab, for the respondent No.1.
Mr. Sarabjit Singh Sidhu, Advocate, for
respondent No.2.
. . .
M.M.S. Bedi, J (Oral)
1. The petitioner alongwith other was roped in a criminal case FIR No.306 dated 7.9.2004 registered under Sections 326, 324, 452, 323, 427, 504, 307, 34 IPC at Police Station Banga, District S.B.S. Nagar, alongwith all consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.
2. The Court of Sessions, though, has acquitted the Crl. Misc. No.M-14023 of 2012 [2] co-accused under Sections 307, 341 IPC, however, convicted him under Sections 326, 323 and 324 IPC. The petitioner being a proclaimed offender, subsequently, surrendered before the Court concerned and is now facing trial. Though the instant petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the FIR as he has been charged under Sections 452, 323, 341 and 506 IPC.
3. It has been informed that the appeal of co-accused of the petitioner is pending before this Court. It has also been informed that the petitioner is now an NRI and the matter has been compounded.
4. I have taken into account the facts and circumstances of the case and am of the opinion that criminal proceedings and FIR qua the petitioner cannot be partially quashed but at the same time, taking into consideration the fact that the matter has been compounded and the petitioner has been charged under Sections 452, 323, 341 and 506 IPC, the permission can be granted for compounding all the offences before the Trial Court. Prima facie, offence under Section 452 IPC is not made out as the co-accused of the petitioner stands acquitted under Section 452 IPC.
5. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of holding that the present petition for quashing the FIR is not maintainable, however, in case the petitioner and complainant Crl. Misc. No.M-14023 of 2012 [3] approach the Trial Court for compounding all the offences, the Trial Court is granted the permission to permit the parties to compound the offences and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
(M.M.S. Bedi)
July 18, 2012 Judge
avin