Allahabad High Court
Praveen Kumar Narang vs State Of U.P. And Another on 30 August, 2022
Author: Gautam Chowdhary
Bench: Gautam Chowdhary
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Court No. - 85 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 14410 of 2022 Applicant :- Praveen Kumar Narang Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Krishna Dutt Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
vkosnd dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] eq0v0la0 183 lu 2021] vUrxZr /kkjk 420] 406] 380] 504] 506 Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk dksrokyh uxj] ftyk lgkjuiqj esa izszf"kr vkjksi i= fn0 1&10&2021 ls mn~Hkwr okn la0 13147 lu 2021] tks lh0ts0,e0] lgkjuiqj ds U;k;ky; esa yfEcr gS rFkk blesa ikfjr izlaKku vkns'k fn0 13&10&2021 ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj'khyu fd;kA vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosndx.k funksZ"k gSa] vkosndx.k us rFkkdfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS rFkk lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr izlaKku@rych vkns'k ldkj.k ,oa fof/k lEer ugha gS] vkosndx.k ds fo:) mijksDr /kkjkvksa dk dksbZ vijk/k ugha curk gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd og izkFkZuk [k.M esa dh xbZ vU; izkFkZukvksa ij ncko ugha Mkyuk pkgrs gSa] cfYd voj U;k;ky; esa mUekspu izkFkZuk i= nkf[ky djus dh vuqefr pkgrs gSa rFkk muds }kjk nkf[ky fd, x, mUekspu izkFkZuk i= dk fuLrkj.k djus dk] lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks funsZ'k fn;k tk;A eSaus mHk;i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ ij fopkj fd;kA mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ ij fopkjksijkUr ,oa vfHkys[k ds voyksdu ls bl Lrj ij ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk gS fd vkosndx.k ds f[kykQ mijksDr /kkjkvksa ds vUrxZr dksbZ vijk/k xfBr ugha gksrk gSA vkosndx.k dh vksj ls tks rdZ izLrqr fd, x, gSa os fookfnr rkfF;d iz'u ls lacaf/kr gSa] ftuds fo"k; esa bl U;k;ky; }kjk /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vkosnu i= ij dksbZ QSlyk nsuk laHko ugha gS] pwWfd mDr rkfF;d iz'uksa dk fofu'p; fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk gh lk{; vkus ds ckn fd;k tk ldrk gSA bl laca/k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, AIR 1960 SC 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cri.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P. Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cri.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another, (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cri.) 283 esa fn, x, fu.kZ;ksa esa ;g vo/kkfjr fd;k x;k gS fd bl Lrj ij dsoy izFke n`"V;k gh dsl ns[kk tkuk gSA eqyfteku dk tks fookfnr cpko dFku gS ml ij bl Lrj ij fopkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk gSA rn~uqlkj ;g vkosnu i= cyghu gS vkSj fujLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA gkyWkfd vkosndx.k ;fn pkgsa rks lEcfU/kr v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds le{k mUekspu izkFkZuk i= nkf[ky dj ldrs gSaA ;fn vkosndx.k }kjk voj U;k;ky; esa mUekspu izkFkZuk i= nkf[ky fd;k tkrk gS rks lacaf/kr U;k;ky; }kjk mHk; i{k dks lqudj] U;k;ksfpr vkns'k ds ek/;e ls mldk fuLrkj.k miyC/k lk{; ds vk/kkj ij izkFkfedrk ds vk/kkj ij 'kh/kzrkiwoZd fd;k tk;A mDr funsZ'kksa ds lkFk ;g izkFkZuki= vfUre :i ls fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA fn0 % 30&8&2022 ds0lh0flag