Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

M.A.Sulfiker Ali vs P.K.Krishnaswamy on 12 March, 2015

Author: C.K.Abdul Rehim

Bench: C.K.Abdul Rehim

       

  

   

 
 
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                                    PRESENT:

                        THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM

             THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/21ST PHALGUNA, 1936

                                    RP.No. 263 of 2015 IN OP.4128/2003
                                        ---------------------------------------


                               OP 4128/2003 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA

REVIEW PETITIONER(S):
----------------------------------------

            M.A.SULFIKER ALI, AGED 43 YEARS
            SON OF ABDUL RAHIMAN, AGED 43 YEARS,
            P.T.A. PRESIDENT, SARVAJANA HIGH SCHOOL
            PUDUCODE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT (RESIDING AT BISMILLAH MANZIL)
            THACHANADI, PUDUCODE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

            BY ADV. SRI.V.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR

RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------

          1. P.K.KRISHNASWAMY
              KRISHNASREE, UMANAGAR
              P.O. KODUNTHIRAPULLY, PALAKKAD - 678 004.

          2. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS
              SECRETARY TO GENERAL EDUCATION (B) DEPARTMENT
              SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

          3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION
              PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678 001.

          4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER
               PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678 001.

          5. THE HEADMASTER,
                SARVAJANA HIGH SCHOOL, PUDUCODE,
                PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678 687.

          6. P.V. PARAMESWARA IYER
               RESIDING AT PUDUCODE VILLAGE
               PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678 687

          7. M.V. MUSTHAFA, AGED 65 YEARS
              S/O.MOIDEEN PILLAI RAWTHER
              ANCHUMURI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT 678 687

 RP.No. 263 of 2015

      8. K.A.VELUKUTTY,
         KANNATHUKAD,
         MANAPPADAM
         PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678 687.

     9. KRISHNAN UNNI, SAI KRIPA,
         MANAPPADAM
         PALAKKAD DISTRICT 678 687.

     10. KARUNAKARA WARRIER,
         POURNAMI NORTH VILLAGE, PUTHUCODE
         PALAKKAD - 678 687.

     11. K.U. UNNIMOHAMMED
         MORAIYOOR, (VIA) MONGAM,
         MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 673 642

     12. P.B.VENKATARAMAN
          S/O.LATE P.S. BALAKRISHNAN, B15, AISHIANA,
          21, VENUS COLONY, 2ND STREET, ALWARPET
          CHENNAI, 600 018, TAMIL NADU.

     13. P.R. SUNDARAM,
          LATE P.S. RAMACHANDRAN, 22, ELDAMS ROAD,
          ALWARPET, CHENNAI - 600 018, TAMIL NADU

     14. THE NADUVIL MADAM, THRISSUR
           REPRESENTED BY SRI. K. KRISHNAN NAMBOODIRI
           MANAGER, NADUVIL MADHAM GROUP DEVASWOMS,
           THIRUVALATHUR, PALAGHAT DISTRICT - 678 551.

     15. SREE ANNAPPOORNESWARI POOJA CO-ORDINATORS TRUST
           (ALSO KNOWN AS SAPCO TRUST), PUTHUCODE SOUTH VILLAGE,
            PALAGHAT DISTRICT - 678 687, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
            K.R. KAMALAM

       16. M.C. CHELLAMANI
           AGED 54 YEARS, S/OCHINNAN, MOTHAYAMKODU VEEDU,
           MEMBER, WARD NO.XI, PUTHUCODE GRAMA PANCHAYATH
           PUTHUCODE POST, PALAKKAD - 678 687.

      R2 TO R4 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.V. ELIAS
      BY SMT.PREETHY KARNUNAKARAN
      BY SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON
      BY SRI.T.B.HOOD
      BY SRI.N.R.MADHAVA MENON
      BY SRI.K.I.MAYANKUTTY MATHER
      BY SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED
      BY SRI.MAT.PAI
      BY SMT.PRABHA R.MENON


       THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-03-2015,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:



                     C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J.
               ===================
                    R.P. No. 263 OF 2015
            =======================
           Dated this the 12th day of March, 2015


                            ORDER

The review petitioner herein was not a party in the writ petition. This review petition was filed based on leave granted this court. The Review Petitioner is the President of Parent Teacher Association of the School concerned. It is stated that he is a person deeply interested in the well being of the school. In the judgment dated 20.11.2014 this court had directed the Government to take an appropriate decision with respect to management of the school in question, after affording opportunity of personal hearing to the writ petitioner and all other parties concerned. Only claim of the petitioner is that he may also be given a chance of personal hearing, he being a person interested in the affairs of the school. Since it is already directed that a decision shall be taken after hearing all the parties concerned, this court is of the opinion that it can be R.P. No. 263 OF 2015 2 clarified that an opportunity of personal hearing should be afforded to the review petitioner also.

Hence this review petition is disposed of by clarifying the judgment to the extent of directing the 1st respondent to afford an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner herein also.

C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE SKV