Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 141]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Daya Ram vs Sh. P.C. Dhiman & Others on 6 January, 2015

Bench: Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Tarlok Singh Chauhan

                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
                                  SHIMLA




                                                                         .
                                                  COPC No. 580 of 2014





                                                  Date of decision: 06.1.2015

     Daya Ram                                                        ....Petitioner





                                                  Versus
     Sh. P.C. Dhiman & others                                        ....Respondents

     Coram:




     The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice.
     The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
     Whether approved for reporting ?1
     ____________________________________________________

     For the petitioner :          Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate.

     For the respondents:                         Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate
                                                  General with Mr. Romesh
                                                  Verma, Mr. Anup Rattan,


                                                  Additional Advocate Generals
                                                  and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy
                                                  Advocate General.




         Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (Oral)

It is contended that the respondents have not complied with the directions, dated 28th April, 2014, passed by this Court in CWP No. 2816 of 2014.

2. Issue notice. Mr. J.K. Verma, learned Deputy Advocate General, waives notice on behalf of the respondents.

3. In the given circumstances, the contempt petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to comply with the directions, referred to above, within a period of six weeks and report compliance before the Additional Registrar (Judicial).

1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?. ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 17:28:59 :::HCHP -2-

4. The Registry to convey the order to the respondents and also furnish copy of the same to the learned .

Advocate General.

Copy dasti.

( Mansoor Ahmad Mir ) Chief Justice.






     January 6, 2015                     (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
      ( hemlata)  r                              Judge.









                                       ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 17:28:59 :::HCHP