Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

Satyabrata Sahu & Others vs Opsc Cuttack & Ors. ..... Opposite ... on 31 August, 2021

Author: B.R. Sarangi

Bench: B.R. Sarangi

                                     1




       IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK


                     W.P.(C) No. 25896 of 2021

 Satyabrata Sahu & others                .....                  Petitioners

                                                       Mr. Achyutananda
                                                      Pattanaik, Advocate
                               Vs.
 OPSC Cuttack & Ors.                     .....             Opposite Parties

                                                            State Counsel


            CORAM:
               DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

                                          ORDER

31.08.2021 Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

1

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

3. The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeks to direct the Opposite Parties to take necessary steps to allow the candidatures of the petitioners by the way of relaxing their maximum age limit as more than 50 years by amending the Clause-3 (Concerning age limit) of the Advertisement No.7 of 2021-22, issued by the Odisha Public Service Commission at Cuttack for recruitment to the posts of Assistant Director of Sericulture, Group-B of Odisha Textiles & Sericulture Service (Sericulture Cadre) under Handlooms, Textiles & Handicrafts Department.

2

4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioners have made representation to opposite party no.1 vide Annexure-4 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time.

5. Considering the limited grievance of the petitioners, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.1 to consider the representation filed by the petitioners vide Annexure-4 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE A.K. Rana