Bombay High Court
Cmog Fuel Dmcc vs Oss Altus Uber (Imo No. 9127318) on 27 September, 2018
ADN
Before: Aniruddha M. Chandekar
Prothonotary & Senior Master.
Date: 27th September, 2018
CALLED OUT FOR REJECTION
96. COMSSL/955/2018 ) Tuba Qureshi I/b Rejender Saluja, Advocate for the
) Plaintiff.
)
) P.C.: The Plaintiff and/or his/her Advocate to remove
) office objections on the Suit and to get the same
) numbered and/or registered on or before 25.10.2018,
) failing Suit to stand rejected under the provisions of
) O.S. Rule 986 for non-compliance of office objections.
)
)
97. COMSSL/969/2018 ) Mr. Medhas Nambiar I/b The Law Point, Advocate for
) the Plaintiff.
)
)
) P.C.: The Plaintiff and/or his/her Advocate to remove
) office objections on the Suit and to get the same
) numbered and/or registered on or before 25.10.2018,
) failing Suit to stand rejected under the provisions of
O.S. Rule 986 for non-compliance of office objections.
98. COMSSL/979/2018 ) Mr. Ashish Suryavanshi I/b Kalpana Kharate, Advocate
) for the Plaintiff.
)
) P.C.: The Plaintiff and/or his/her Advocate to remove
) office objections on the Suit and to get the same
) numbered and/or registered on or before 25.10.2018,
) failing Suit to stand rejected under the provisions of
) O.S. Rule 986 for non-compliance of office objections.
99. COMASL/27/2018 ) Mr. Sidhant Manek I/b Crawford bayley & Co.,
) Advocate for the Plaintiff.
100. COMASL/28/2018 )
) P.C.: The Plaintiff and/or his/her Advocate to
) remove office objections on the Suit and to get the same
) numbered and/or registered on or before 25.10.2018,
) failing Suit to stand rejected under the provisions of
) O.S. Rule 986 for non-compliance of office objections.
)
27/09/2018Prothonotary and Senior Master ::: Uploaded on - 04/10/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 04/10/2018 23:08:07 :::