Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Vinod Sumatilal Shah vs Kantilal Maganlal Shah And Ors on 15 October, 2025

                                                                                                       ial-31411-2025.doc




                                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                                   INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.31411 OF 2025
                                                                      IN
                                                         FIRST APPEAL NO.1065 OF 1994
                                                                      IN
                                                           BCCC SUIT NO.5450 OF 1979


            Digitally signed
SMITA
            by SMITA
            RAJNIKANT
                               Vinod Sumatilal Shah                            ..     Applicant.
RAJNIKANT   JOSHI
JOSHI       Date:
            2025.10.15
            17:29:36 +0530
                               In the matter between
                               Taraben Shah & Another                          ..     Appellants.
                                      v/s.
                               Kantilal Shah & Others                          ..     Respondents.
                                      And
                               Kshama Mehta & Others                           ..     Prop. Respondents.



                               Adv. Jay Vyas i/b. Dhru & Co., for the Appellants.

                                                                     CORAM: FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA,J.

DATE : 15th OCTOBER, 2025.

P. C:-

1 Not on board. Mentioned. Taken on board.
2 By an Order dated 1st October, 2025 passed by this Court, the Application for amendment was allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), thereby allowing the Applicants to bring on record the legal heirs of deceased Respondent No.5 namely - Kshama Haresh Mehta and Haresh Mehta.
                               S.R.JOSHI                                                                           1 of 2




                                      ::: Uploaded on - 15/10/2025                  ::: Downloaded on - 15/10/2025 21:54:54 :::
                                                                         ial-31411-2025.doc


3                 Today, the learned Counsel for the Appellants has informed
the Court that since Kshama Haresh Mehta is already shown as Respondent No.6, the Department is not allowing the Applicants to carry out the amendment as proposed.
4 It is the case of the Appellants that Kshama Haresh Mehta has been shown as Respondent No.6 in an individual capacity and, hence, can be added as Respondent No.5-a as a legal heir of Respondent No.5.
5 In these circumstances, the Department is directed to allow the Appellants to carry out the amendment as per Schedule of amendment annexed to Ex. C to the Interim Application.

(FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA,J.) S.R.JOSHI 2 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 15/10/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 15/10/2025 21:54:54 :::