Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Chattisgarh High Court

V. S. Rajgopal Iyer vs State Of Madhya Pradesh 85 ... on 27 November, 2018

Author: Prashant Kumar Mishra

Bench: Prashant Kumar Mishra

                                                                   NAFR

            HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                          MCC No. 875 of 2018

     • V. S. Rajgopal Iyer S/o G.S. Mani Iyer, Aged About 56 Years
       Occupation Govt. Service, R/o Murra, District Raigarh
       Chhattisgarh

                                                           ---- Petitioner

                                 Versus

     1. State Of Madhya Pradesh Through The Secretary, Department Of
        Education, Vallab Bhawan, Bhopal Now State Of Chhattisgarh
        Through The Secretary, Department Of Education, Mantarlaya,
        Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur,
        Chhattisgarh

     2. Commissioner, Public Instructions, Chhattisgarh            Raipur
        Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

     3. Joint Director, Public Instructions, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur
        Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

                                                        ---- Respondents

For Petitioner Shri Animesh Verma, Advocate Hon'ble Justice Mr. Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 27/11/2018

1. This is an application for restoration of WPS No.606/2005, which was dismissed for non compliance of the Court order dated 05.04.2016.

2. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, it is allowed and WPS No.606/2005 is directed to be restored to its original number, subject however on payment of cost of Rs.1,000/- to the Chhattisgarh High Court Bar Association within a period of one week from today.

3. It is made clear that if the cost is not paid within a week, this order shall lose its efficacy.

Sd/-

Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Nirala