Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Aditya Birla Finance Limited vs City Oil Private Limited & Ors on 24 April, 2024

Author: Jasmeet Singh

Bench: Jasmeet Singh

                                    $~52
                                    *           IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                                    +           ARB.P. 1043/2023
                                                ADITYA BIRLA FINANCE LIMITED         ..... Petitioner
                                                              Through: Mr Aman Vasisth and Ms Sanya
                                                                       Lamba, Advs.
                                                              versus

                                                CITY OIL PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS          ..... Respondents
                                                              Through: Ms Seema Singh, Mr Dayanand
                                                                        Sharma and Ms Kalpana Singh, Advs.

                                                CORAM:
                                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH
                                                             ORDER

% 24.04.2024

1. This is a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an Arbitrator.

2. As per the petitioner, the petitioner had initially availed loan in the year 2017 and had executed the Term Loan Agreement dated 12.09.2017. The Term Loan Agreement dated 12.09.2017 contemplated the seat of arbitration as Mumbai. As per the petitioner, the said loan was subsequently restructured and modified in the year 2018 and thereafter in the year 2019.

3. In the year 2019, the petitioner executed a Facility Agreement dated 31.10.2019 and Deed of Guarantees dated 31.10.2019.

4. Subsequently, the petitioner executed a Facility Agreement dated 22.07.2020, Extension of Mortgage dated 27.07.2020, Irrevocable Power of Attorney dated 22.07.2020.

5. Except the first loan documents of the year 2017, all other subsequent This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/04/2024 at 21:05:08 documents contained arbitration clause wherein the place of the arbitration has been held to be Delhi.

6. Clauses 25.17 of the Loan Agreement dated 31.10.2019, Facility Agreement dated 31.10.2019, Clause 32.17 of Term Loan Agreement dated 22.07.2020 and Clause 32.17 of Facility Agreement dated 24.11.2021. They are reproduced as under:

Loan Agreement dated 31.10.2019 "25.17 Arbitration:
All claims or disputes arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be settled by arbitration. The arbitration tribunal shall consist of a sole arbitrator to be appointed by Lender. All parties to this Agreement hereby expressly consent to Lender being the sole appointing authority. Any vacancy created in the arbitration tribunal, for any reason whatsoever, shall also be filled only by Lender acting as the sole appointing authority. The place of arbitration shall be Delhi. Parties agree that the courts in Delhi shall have the exclusive jurisdiction to exercise all powers under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Notwithstanding anything contained hereinabove, in the event the legal status of the Facility Provider changes or in the event of the law being made or amended so as to bring the Facility Provider under The Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (the "DRT Act"), to proceed to recover dues from the Borrower(s) under the DRT Act, the arbitration provisions hereinbefore contained shall, at the option of the Facility Provider, cease to have any effect and if arbitration proceedings are commenced but no arbitral award is made, then at the option of the Facility Provider such proceedings shall stand terminated and the mandate of the arbitrator shall come to an end from the date of the making of the law or the date when amendment becomes effective or the date when the Facility Provider exercises the option of This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/04/2024 at 21:05:09 terminating the mandate of arbitrator, as the case may be. Provided that neither a change in the legal status of the Facility Provider nor a change in law as referred to in this sub paragraph above, will result in invalidating an existing award passed by an arbitral tribunal constituted pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement." Facility Agreement dated 31.10.2019 32.17 Arbitration:
All claims or disputes arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be settled by arbitration. The arbitration tribunal shall consist of a sole arbitrator to be appointed by Lender. All parties to this Agreement hereby expressly consent to Lender being the sole appointing authority. Any vacancy created in the arbitration tribunal, for any reason whatsoever, shall also be filled only by Lender acting as the sole appointing authority. The place of arbitration shall be Delhi. Parties agree that the courts in Delhi shall have the exclusive jurisdiction to exercise all powers under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Notwithstanding anything contained hereinabove, in the event the legal status of the Facility Provider changes or in the event of the law being made or amended so as to bring the Facility Provider under The Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (the "DRT Act"), to proceed to recover dues from the Borrower(s) under the DRT Act, the arbitration provisions hereinbefore contained shall, at the option of the Facility Provider, cease to have any effect and if arbitration proceedings are commenced but no arbitral award is made, then at the option of the Facility Provider such proceedings shall stand terminated and the mandate of the arbitrator shall come to an end from the date of the making of the law or the date when amendment becomes effective or the date when the Facility Provider exercises the option of terminating the mandate of arbitrator, as the case may be. Provided that neither a change in the legal status of the Facility Provider nor a change in law as referred to in this sub paragraph above, will This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/04/2024 at 21:05:09 result in invalidating an existing award passed by an arbitral tribunal constituted pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement."
Term Loan Agreement dated 22.07.2020 "32.17 Arbitration:
All claims or disputes arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be settled by arbitration. The arbitration tribunal shall consist of a sole arbitrator to be appointed by Lender. All parties to this Agreement hereby expressly consent to Lender being the sole appointing authority. Any vacancy created in the arbitration tribunal, for any reason whatsoever, shall also be filled only by Lender acting as the sole appointing authority. The place of arbitration shall be Delhi. Parties agree that the courts in Delhi shall have the exclusive jurisdiction to exercise all powers under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Notwithstanding anything contained hereinabove, in the event the legal status of the Facility Provider changes or in the event of the law being made or amended so as to bring the Facility Provider under The Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (the "DRT Act"), to proceed to recover dues from the Borrower(s) under the DRT Act, the arbitration provisions herein before contained shall, at the option of the Facility Provider, cease to have any effect and if arbitration proceedings are commenced but no arbitral award is made, then at the option of the Facility Provider such proceedings shall stand terminated and the mandate of the arbitrator shall come to an end from the date of the making of the law or the date when amendment becomes effective or the date when the Facility Provider exercises the option of terminating the mandate of arbitrator, as the case may be. Provided that neither a change in the legal status of the Facility Provider nor a change in law as referred to in this sub paragraph above, will result in invalidating an existing award passed by an arbitral tribunal constituted pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement."
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/04/2024 at 21:05:09 Clause 32.17 of Facility Agreement dated 24.11.2021 "32.17 Arbitration All claims or disputes arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be settled by arbitration. The arbitration tribunal shall consist of a sole arbitrator to be appointed by Lender. All parties to this Agreement hereby expressly consent to Lender being the sole appointing authority. Any vacancy created in the arbitration tribunal, for any reason whatsoever, shall also be filled only by Lender acting as the sole appointing authority. The place of arbitration shall be Delhi. Parties agree that the courts in Delhi shall have the exclusive jurisdiction to exercise all powers under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Notwithstanding anything contained hereinabove, in the event the legal status of the Facility Provider changes or in the event of the law being made or amended so as to bring the Facility Provider under The Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (the "DRT Act"), to proceed to recover dues from the Borrower(s) under the DRT Act, the arbitration provisions herein before contained shall, at the option of the Facility Provider, cease to have any effect and if arbitration proceedings are commenced but no arbitral award is made, then at the option of the Facility Provider such proceedings shall stand terminated and the mandate of the arbitrator shall come to an end from the date of the making of the law or the date when amendment becomes effective or the date when the Facility Provider exercises the option of terminating the mandate of arbitrator, as the case may be. Provided that neither a change in the legal status of the Facility Provider nor a change in law as referred to in this sub paragraph above, will result in invalidating an existing award passed by an arbitral tribunal constituted pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement."

7. All the said clauses contemplate the venue of Arbitration at Delhi. Hence, the present petition.

8. The respondents have filed their counter affidavit where their only This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/04/2024 at 21:05:09 defence is that this Court does not have territorial jurisdiction in view of Clause 23.16 of the Term Loan Agreement dated 12.09.2017, which reads as under:

"23.16 Arbitration:
All claims or disputes arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be settled by arbitration. The arbitration tribunal shall consist of a sole arbitrator to be appointed by ABFL. All parties to this Agreement hereby expressly consent to ABFL being the sole appointing authority. Any vacancy created in the arbitration tribunal, for any reason whatsoever, shall also be filled only by ABFL acting as the sole appointing authority. Only a former judge of any High Court or the Supreme Court will be eligible to act as an arbitrator under this clause. The place of arbitration shall be Mumbai. Parties agree that the Courts in Mumbai shall have the exclusive jurisdiction to exercise all powers under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996."

9. In the present case, the Term Loan Agreement dated 12.09.2017 was subsequently modified by subsequent Loan Agreements, Line Of Credit documents and Facility Agreements executed between the petitioner and the respondents. The said documents contain arbitration clause with the venue of arbitration at Delhi. Even the notice under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 invoking arbitration dated 13.07.2023 relies on the agreements dated 2019, 2020 and 2021 wherein the venue of arbitration is Delhi.

10. For the said reasons, the petition is allowed. Since the parties are still having disputes between them, the following directions are issued:-

i) Mr. Sidharth Sharma, Advocate (Mob. No. 7400111111) is appointed as a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/04/2024 at 21:05:09

ii) The arbitration will be held under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre, Delhi High Court, Sher Shah Road, New Delhi hereinafter, referred to as the „DIAC‟). The remuneration of the learned Arbitrator shall be in terms of the Fourth Schedule of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

iii) The learned Arbitrator is requested to furnish a declaration in terms of Section 12 of the Act prior to entering into the reference.

iv) It is made clear that all the rights and contentions of the parties, including as to the arbitrability of any of the claim, any other preliminary objection, as well as claims on merits of the dispute of either of the parties, are left open for adjudication by the learned arbitrator.

v) The parties shall approach the learned Arbitrator within two weeks from today.

11. The counter affidavits handed over in Court today is taken on record.

JASMEET SINGH, J APRIL 24, 2024 sr Click here to check corrigendum, if any This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/04/2024 at 21:05:09