Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Rugby Renergy Private Limited vs Intex Technologies (India) Limited on 11 November, 2021

Author: Vibhu Bakhru

Bench: Vibhu Bakhru

                         $~10 & 11
                         *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                         +     O.M.P. (COMM) 320/2021 & I.A. 13769/2021

                               RUGBY RENERGY PRIVATE LIMITED         ..... Petitioner
                                           Through  Mr. Krishnendu Datta, Sr. Adv. with
                                                    Mr. Simran Mehta and Mr. Bhimraj
                                                    Ahary, Advs.

                                                   versus

                               INTEX TECHNOLOGIES (INDIA) LIMITED    ..... Respondent
                                            Through  Mr. Amardeep Singh and Mr. Gitansh
                                                     Arora, Advs.
                         And

                         +     O.M.P. (COMM) 321/2021 & I.A. 13771/2021

                               RUGBY RENERGY PRIVATE LIMITED         ..... Petitioner
                                           Through  Mr. Krishnendu Datta, Sr. Adv. with
                                                    Mr. Simran Mehta and Mr. Bhimraj
                                                    Ahary, Advs.

                                                   versus

                               SH NARENDRA BANSAL                               ..... Respondent
                                            Through             Mr. Amardeep Singh and Mr. Gitansh
                                                                Arora, Advs.

                               CORAM:
                               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

                                            ORDER

% 11.11.2021

1. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that there is no requirement to file a reply and he would rely on the record of the Arbitral Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:DUSHYANT RAWAL Tribunal.

2. A request for an adjournment is made by Mr. Datta, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner.

3. At his request, list on 03.12.2021.

VIBHU BAKHRU, J NOVEMBER 11, 2021 dr Click here to check corrigendum, if any Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:DUSHYANT RAWAL