Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court - Orders

Imteyaz Ansari vs The State Of Bihar on 14 December, 2017

Author: Anjana Mishra

Bench: Anjana Mishra

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  Criminal Miscellaneous No.58915 of 2017
                   Arising Out of PS.Case No. -214 Year- 2017 Thana -M ADANPURA District- AURANGABAD
                 ======================================================
                 1. Imteyaz Ansari, S/o Md. Zalil Daraivar, R/o Village Isri, P.S.- Nimiya
                 Ghat, District- Giridih (Jharkhand).

                                                                              .... ....   Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 1. The State of Bihar.

                                                              .... .... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh
                 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Awadhesh Kumar Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA
                 ORAL ORDER

2   14-12-2017

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is in custody since 18.09.2017 in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 214 of 2017 for the offence registered under Sections 395, 397, 328, 412 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that two trucks had collided and one Satendra Kumar Saw, driver of one of the trucks had been demanding compensation. The petitioner being a bystander, who was watching the occurrence, was apprehended as being one of those persons, who was also the person of demanding the said compensation. On the basis of his confession, the petitioner is now being prosecuted, which is not Patna High Court Cr.M isc. No.58915 of 2017 (2) dt.14-12-2017 2/2 admissible in evidence. It is further submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and till date no T.I. Parade has also been conducted.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 214 of 2017.

(Anjana Mishra, J) Jagdish/-

  U            T