Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Ramen Deka vs The State Of Assam on 22 September, 2025

Author: Soumitra Saikia

Bench: Soumitra Saikia

                                                                    Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010209262025




                                                             undefined

                       THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                          Case No. : WP(C)/5626/2025

         RAMEN DEKA
         S/O- LATE DINESH DEKA @ DINESH CHANDRA DAS, VILL. JOJI, P.O.
         LOHARGHAT, P.S. PALASBARI, KAMRUP, ASSAM



         VERSUS

         THE STATE OF ASSAM
         REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY CUM CHAIRMAN OF STATE LEVEL
         COMMITTEE FOR COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT, GOVT. OF ASSAM,
         DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06

         2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
         TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
          PERSONNEL (B) DEPARTMENT
          DISPUR
          GUWAHATI-06

         3:THE DEPUTY SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
          PERSONNEL (B) DEPARTMENT
          DISPUR
          GUWAHATI-06

         4:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
          EXCISE DEPARTMENT
          DISPUR
          GUWAHATI-06

         5:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF
         ASSAM
          GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
          DISPUR
          GUWAHATI-0
                                                                         Page No.# 2/2


Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR ABDUL WAHID BARBHUIYA, MR. A M S MAZUMDER

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, GA, ASSAM




                                     BEFORE
                      HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

                                        ORDER

22.09.2025 Heard Mr. A.M.S. Mazumder, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Issue notice returnable within four weeks.

Mr. C.K.S. Baruah, learned Government Advocate appears for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3; Mr. P.N. Goswami, learned Standing Counsel, Excise Department appears for the respondent No. 4 and Mr. A. Phukan, learned Standing Counsel, GAD appears for the respondent No.5.

Since the respondents are duly represented, notices are waived. However, extra copies be furnished within a period of one week from today.

Matter be listed after returnable date.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant