Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

State Of Haryana And Others vs Ex -Constable Ram Kumar on 3 November, 2009

Author: Adarsh Kumar Goel

Bench: Adarsh Kumar Goel

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                    AT CHANDIGARH.

                                 LPA No.511 of 1999 (O&M)
                              Date of decision:   3.11.2009




State of Haryana and others
                                                 -----Appellants
                              Vs.
Ex -Constable Ram Kumar
                                                 ----Respondent



CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH


Present:- Mr. Rameshwar Malik, Addl.Advocate General,
          Haryana for the appellants.


Adarsh Kumar Goel,J.

1. This appeal has been preferred by the State against order of learned Single Judge directing substitution of punishment of dismissal by that of compulsory retirement with effect from the date of order of dismissal from service.

2. Respondent was appointed as Constable and he served for about 19 years from 4.12.1973 to 10.8.1992. A charge sheet was given to him alleging misconduct of consuming liquor, while on duty on 5.5.1992, and absence LPA No.511 of 1999 (O&M) 2 from duty from 5.5.1992 to 31.7.1992. After enquiry, the charge was held to have been established and order of dismissal from service was passed, which was confirmed in appeal.

3. Only ground for challenge before learned Single Judge was that having regard to service already rendered, the respondent should not be deprived of the pension, which plea prevailed with the learned Single Judge. Interim relief having been denied, the pension must have been worked out and paid. More than ten years have already passed from the date of the order passed by learned Single Judge.

4. Even though, two views may be possible about interference by this Court with the impugned order of dismissal, in exercise of power of judicial review, having regard to the developments that have already taken place mentioned above, no interference is called for by this Court, at this stage.

5. The appeal is dismissed. .

                                           (Adarsh Kumar Goel)
                                                    Judge


November 03, 2009                              (Gurdev Singh)
'gs'                                               Judge
 LPA No.511 of 1999 (O&M)   3