Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 4]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Sri Bijan Behari Maiti vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 16 August, 2016

Author: Joymalya Bagchi

Bench: Joymalya Bagchi

                                       1


                IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION

Present:
The Hon'ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi


                               W.P. 13906 (W) of 2016


                                Sri Bijan Behari Maiti
                                          Vs.
                           The State of West Bengal & Ors.




       For the petitioner : Mr. Prabir Chatterjee


       For the State :         Mr. Sabir Ahmed,
                               Mr. Pritheeraj Sen



Heard on :   16.08.2016


Judgement on: 16.08.2016


Joymalya Bagchi, J. :-



       The petitioner is a victim of acid attack and had suffered

serious injuries for which he was required to undergo medical

treatment including skin grafting.

       It has been argued on behalf of the State that the petitioner is

entitled to get compensation of Rs.50,000/- in view of the schedule
                                     2


appended to the Victim Compensation Scheme notified on 1st

November, 2012.

      Relying on the Apex Court's decision in the case of Laxmi vs.

Union of India & Ors. (2014) 4 SCC 431, Mr. Chatterjee, learned

Counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that compensation

payable to a victim of acid attack cannot be less than of

Rs.3,00,000/-.

      I have considered the submissions of the learned Counsel

appearing for both the parties. Admittedly the petitioner had suffered

loss of sight in one eye as well as other extensive injuries due to acid

attack.   Accused persons have been convicted in the criminal case

arising out of the incident of acid attack upon the petitioner.

      Question which falls for decision in this writ petition         is

whether the petitioner is entitled to get compensation under the

Victim Compensation Scheme under Section 357A of the Code of

Criminal Procedure and, if so, to what extent.

      With regard to the entitlement of the petitioner there is no

dispute in as much as he is a victim of acid attack. However, it is

contended that in the light of the scheme and the schedule appended

thereto the petitioner is entitled to get a sum of Rs.50,000/- only.

On the other hand, reliance is placed on Laxmi vs. Union of India &

Ors.(supra) and an unreported decision of this Court        in W.P. No.

34704(W) of 2013 (Sabana Khatun vs. The State of West Bengal &
                                   3


Ors.) to argue that petitioner is entitled to compensation to the tune

of at least Rs.3,00,000/-.

       In Laxmi vs. Union of India & Ors.(supra) the Apex Court is

held as follows :

      "13. We are informed that pursuant to this provision, 17 States
      and 7 Union Territories have prepared 'Victim Compensation
      Scheme'(for short 'the Scheme'). As regards the victims of acid
      attacks, the compensation mentioned in the Scheme framed by
      these States and Union Territories is un-uniformed. While the
      State of Bihar has provided for compensation of Rs.25,000 in
      such Scheme, the State of Rajasthan has provided for Rs.2
      lakhs of compensation.          In our view, the compensation
      provided in the Scheme by most of the States/Union Territories
      is inadequate. It cannot be overlooked that acid attack victims
      need to undergo a series of plastic surgeries and other
      corrective treatments. Having regard to this problem, the
      learned Solicitor General suggested to us that the
      compensation by the States/Union Territories for acid attack
      victims must be enhanced to at least Rs 3 lakhs as the
      aftercare and rehabilitation cost. The suggestion of the learned
      Solicitor General is very fair.


      14. We, accordingly, direct that the acid attack victims shall be
      paid compensation of at least Rs.3 lakhs by the State
      Government/Union Territory concerned as the aftercare and
      rehabilitation cost. Of this amount, a sum of Rs.1 lakh shall
      be paid to such victim within 15 days of occurrence of such
      incident (or being brought to the notice of the State
      Government/Union of Territory) to facilitate immediate medical
      attention and expenses in this regard. The balance sum of
      Rs.2 lakhs shall be paid as expeditiously as may be possible
      and positively within two months thereafter.           The Chief
      Secretaries of the States and the Administrators of the Union
      Territories shall ensure compliance with the above direction."

      The ratio in the aforesaid authority was quoted with approval

by another learned Single Judge of this Court of W.P. No. 34704(W) of

2013 wherein it was held that a victim of acid attack is entitled to a
                                    4


higher compensation in terms of the ratio laid down by the Apex

Court and not the schedule appended to the Scheme framed by the

State of West Bengal. It appears from the said report that the Apex

Court had fixed a minimum amount of Rs.3,00,000/- to an acid

attack victim. It is, therefore, open to the State respondents to frame

a Victim Compensation Scheme of varying amounts of compensation depending on the degree of injuries including loss of life suffered by the victim, however, the minimum amount of compensation cannot be fixed below Rs.3,00,000/-.

Under such circumstances, I dispose of this writ petition directing the respondent authorities more particularly, the Chief Secretary of the State of West Bengal to pay a total sum of Rs.3,00,000/- to the writ petitioner, an acid attack victim, and out of the said amount a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- be paid within fifteen days from the date of communication of this order and thereafter the balance amount be paid within two months thereafter as prescribed by the Apex Court in its order passed in connection with Laxmi vs. Union of India & Ors. (supra). In the event the payment schedule is not adhered to by the respondent authorities the amount shall carry interest of 15 per cent per annum from the date of accrual of liability till the date of payment.

There shall be no order as to costs.

5

Let photostat plain copy of this order, duly countersigned by Assistant Registrar (Court), be given to the learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties on usual undertaking.

(Joymalya Bagchi, J.)