Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Dhruti Kapadia And Anr vs The Union Of India And 3 Ors on 22 June, 2021

Author: G. S. Kulkarni

Bench: Dipankar Datta, G. S. Kulkarni

                                                                           5-pill 9228-21

Prajakta Vartak


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                  ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

            PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L.) NO.9228 OF 2021

       Dhruti Kapadia & Anr.                                 ...Petitioners
                 vs.
       The Union of India & Ors.                     ...Respondents
                                               .....

       Ms.Dhruti Kapadia with Mr.Kunal Tiwari - Petitioners in person.
       Mr.A.Y. Sakhare, Senior Advocate with Mr.Rohan Mirpury and
       Ms.K.H. Mastakar for MCGM.
       Mr.Abhijit Kulkarni for Pune Municipal Corporation.
       Smt.Purnima Kantharia, GP with Ms.Geeta Shastri, Addl. GP for
       State.
       Mr.Anil C.Singh, ASG with Mr.Advait Sethna i/b.Ms.Anusha
       Amin for Respondent No.1/UOI.
                                     .....

                                     CORAM :- DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ &
                                              G. S. KULKARNI, J.
                                     DATE :-     JUNE 22, 2021


       PC :

1. Ms.Shastri, learned Additional G.P. appearing for the State submits that in deference to the order dated June 14, 2021, the members of the State Covid Task Force have duly applied their minds and have framed draft guidelines for 'home vaccination'. She also submits that a week's time may be given to the Task Force to finalize the guidelines and to obtain the State Government's approval for implementation. 1/3 ::: Uploaded on - 23/06/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 24/06/2021 01:30:45 :::

5-pill 9228-21

2. Ms.Shastri has placed before the Court a copy of the draft guidelines. It is her submission that since the guidelines are still in draft form and is awaiting the approval of the State Government, the same has not been shared either with the petitioner or with the other respondents. As and when the State Government approves the guidelines, such approved guidelines would be duly implemented.

3. We have read the draft guidelines. Prima-facie, we record our satisfaction of the Task Force having proceeded in the right direction. We, however, leave it to the wisdom of the Task Force to incorporate such measures as would ultimately benefit the elderly and the disabled citizens, in whose interest such guidelines have been conceived. We also hope and trust that by Tuesday next, when we propose to take up this PIL petition next, the State Government would be in a position to apprise us how it proposes to go forward by initiating drives for 'home vaccination'. The draft guidelines shall be returned to Ms.Shastri.

4. Stand over to June 29, 2021.

5. The praecipe dated June 15, 2021 of Mr.D.P. Singh, learned counsel stands withdrawn, on the prayer of Mr.Anil 2/3 ::: Uploaded on - 23/06/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 24/06/2021 01:30:45 ::: 5-pill 9228-21 Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the Union of India.

    (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)                    (CHIEF JUSTICE)




                                                                        3/3



::: Uploaded on - 23/06/2021         ::: Downloaded on - 24/06/2021 01:30:45 :::