Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court

Ashish Kumar Ranjan vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 29 September, 2016

Author: Shivaji Pandey

Bench: Shivaji Pandey

          Patna High Court CWJC No.12772 of 2013 dt.29-09-2016




                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12772 of 2013
              ===========================================================
              Ashish Kumar Ranjan Son Of Om Prakash Paswan Resident Of Village - Rasidpur,
              P.S. Akbar Nagar, District - Bhagalpur
                                                                           .... .... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
              1. The State Of Bihar
              2. The Principal Secretary, Home ( Police ) Department Government Of Bihar,
                  Patna
              3. The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna
              4. The Chairman, Central Selection Board, Bihar, Patna
              5. The Secretary, Central Selection Board, Computer Bhawan Jawaharlal Nehru
                  Marg, Patna - 23
                                                                          .... .... Respondent/s
              ===========================================================
                     Appearance :
                     For the Petitioner/s     : Mr. Anant Kumar Bhaskar, Adv.
                                                 Mr. Sanjay Kr. Jha, Adv.
                     For the State            : Mr. Madanjeet Kumar, GP-20
                     For theCSBC             :   Mr.Sanjay Pandey, Adv.
                                                 Mr. Binod Kr. Mishra, Adv.

              ===========================================================
              CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY
              ORAL JUDGMENT

Date: 29-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. The petitioner would not be selected as a Constable on the ground that though he had secured the cut-off mark but the person, who was lastly selected, is senior in age to the petitioner and also the petitioner has not controverted the statement made in the counter affidavit.

In that view of the matter, this case would not survive and is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/-

AFR/NAFR       NAFR
CAV DATE NA
Uploading Date 30.09.2016
Transmission
Date