Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 9, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Manukumara S/O Yallappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 27 February, 2025

Author: Hemant Chandangoudar

Bench: Hemant Chandangoudar

                                                   -1-
                                                               NC: 2025:KHC-D:3951
                                                          CRL.P No. 101086 of 2025




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
                               DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025
                                                 BEFORE
                           THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
                                  CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 101086 OF 2025

                      BETWEEN:

                      1.   MANUKUMARA S/O. YALLAPPA
                           AGE. 47 YEARS, OCC. DRIVER,
                           R/O. DRIVER OF AUTO KA35C2151,
                           HOSALLI VILLAGE, TQ. KUDLIGI
                           AND DIST. BALLARI-583135.

                      2.   BASAVARAJ S/O. THIMMANNA A T
                           AGE. 50 YEARS, OCC. FARMER,
                           R/O. DRIVER OF AUTO KA35C2151,
                           HOSALLI VILLAGE, TQ. KUDLIGI
                           AND DIST. BALLARI.

                      3.   BANDEPPA DODDA GOLLARAHATTI
                           AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. FARMER,
                           R/O. DODDA GOLLARAHATTI VILLAGE,
                           TQ. KUDLIGI AND DIST. BALLARI-583135.

                      4.   SHREE NIDHI
Digitally signed by        AGE. 40 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,
R HEMALATHA
                           R/O. SHREE NIDHI RICE MIL,
Location: HIGH
COURT OF                   CHEELIKERE TOWN, TQ. CHELLAKERE,
KARNATAKA                  DIST. CHITRADURGA-577522.
                                                                    ...PETITIONERS
                      (BY SMT. BHAGYASHREE N.B, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                      RPERESENTED BY
                      STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
                      HIGH OCURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD,
                      THROUGH KUDLIGI POLICE STATION-583135.
                                                                    ...RESPONDENT
                      (BY SRI. T.HANUMAREDDY, AGA)
                                 -2-
                                              NC: 2025:KHC-D:3951
                                       CRL.P No. 101086 of 2025




      THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C. (528
OF BNSS), PRAYING TO, QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN
CONNECTION WITH C.C. NO. 156/2021 (CRIME NO. 20/2020)
REGISTERED BY KUDLIGI POLICE STATION FOR THE OFFENCES
PUNISHABLE U/S. 3, 6(A), 7 OF ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES ACT
1955, U/S. 4, 5, 8 OF KARNATAKA ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES
(STORAGE ACCOUNTS MAINTENANCE VALUE NOTIFICATION)
ORDER 1981, U/S. 3, 4, 12, 18, 19 OF KARNATAKA ESSENTIAL
COMMODITIES      (PUBLIC  DISTRIBUTION     SYSTEM)   PUBLIC
CONTROL ORDER 2016, U/S. 420 OF IPC 1860, PENDING BEFORE
THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUDLIGI, BALLARI, WITH
RESPECT TO PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED NO.1, 2, 3 AND 4.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

                           ORAL ORDER

The petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 4 have been charge- sheeted for offences punishable under Sections 3, 6(A), 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, Section 4, 5, 8 of the Karnataka Essential Commodities (Storage Accounts Maintenance Value Notification) Order 1981, Sections 3, 4, 12, 18, 19 of the Karnataka Essential Commodities (PDS) Public Control Order, 2016 and Section 420 of IPC.

2. The prosecution alleges that on receiving credible information that some unknown persons are transporting food grains/rice meant for distribution under the Public Distribution Scheme, a vehicle belonging to accused No. 2, driven by accused No. 1, was intercepted. Upon inspection, it was found that the petitioners/accused were transporting the rice meant for distribution under PDS, allegedly for unlawful sale in the open market without authorization.

-3-

NC: 2025:KHC-D:3951 CRL.P No. 101086 of 2025

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Addl. Government Advocate for the respondent/State.

4. Upon interception, the police seized the rice being transported in the vehicle. However:

• The police did not send the seized rice to the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) to establish that it was intended for distribution under the Public Distribution System (PDS).
• The prosecution has not produced any material to prove that the petitioners procured the rice from an authorized fair price shop dealer for distribution to beneficiaries.
• In the absence of substantial evidence linking the seized rice to the PDS, prosecuting the petitioners under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act would amount to an abuse of the process of law.

5. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. The impugned proceedings in CC No.156/2021, on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Kudligi, are hereby quashed.

Sd/-

(HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE JTR Ct:vh List No.: 1 Sl No.: 54