Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Bombay High Court

Vishwanath Digambar Wadje vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 8 October, 2021

Author: N. R. Borkar

Bench: Prasanna B. Varale, N. R. Borkar

                      Shubhada S Kadam                               19 wp 6290 & 6571.2021.doc

                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                          CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                         WRIT PETITION NO. 6290 OF 2021
                      Shri Vishwanath Digambar Wadje                       ....Petitioner
                           Versus
                      The State of Maharashtra through Additional
                      Chief Secretary, General Administration
                      Department, Mantralaya and anr.                      ....Respondents

                                                     WITH
                                         WRIT PETITION NO. 6571 OF 2021
                      Aarti Rajendra Pawar                                 ....Petitioner
                          Versus
                      The State of Maharashtra through Additional
                      Chief Secretary, General Administration
                      Department, Mantralaya and 2 ors.                    ....Respondents


                      Shri A. Y. Sakhare, senior advocate with Mr. Ashish Gaikwad, advocate
                      for the petitioners.
                      Ms. Ashwini A. Purav, AGP for the State.


                                                 CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE &
                                                         N. R. BORKAR, JJ.
                                                 DATE     : 8th OCTOBER, 2021.

                      P.C. :


1. Heard Mr. Sakhare, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. Mr. Sakhare claimed urgency on the ground that the respondent-State may appoint the persons on the posts to which the petitioners have opted for in the examination conducted by respondent No.2-MPSC and, if such appointments are made, the purpose of approaching this Court would be frustrated. Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHUBHADA SHANKAR SHANKAR KADAM KADAM Date:

2021.10.08 1/2

17:23:25 +0530 Shubhada S Kadam 19 wp 6290 & 6571.2021.doc

2. In view of the submission, the Registry is directed to issue notice to the respondents returnable on 20th October, 2021. Learned AGP waives notice on behalf of respondent No.1. ( N. R. BORKAR, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.) 2/2