Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

M/S.Swastik Stevedores Pvt. Ltd vs Indian Farmers Fertiliser Cooperative ... on 18 May, 2022

Author: Biswanath Rath

Bench: Biswanath Rath

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                             CMP NO.440 OF 2022

        M/s.Swastik Stevedores Pvt. Ltd.           ....           Petitioner
                                                         Mr.B.Baug, Adv.
                                        -versus-
        Indian Farmers Fertiliser Cooperative      ....    Opposite Party(s)
        Ltd. & ors.
                                                        Mr.S.Mishra, Adv.
                 CORAM:
                 JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
                                    [
                                    ORDER
Order                               18.5.2022
No.
   1.   1.      Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner.

2. It is alleged by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that even though the trial court granted interim protection, after the Plaint got rejected on the Application under Order 7 Rule 11 of C.P.C., the Petitioner preferred an Appeal. In the Appeal, Petitioner filed an Application under Order 39 rules 1 & 2 of C.P.C. along with Order 39 Rule 3 Application.

3. Taking this Court to the order-sheet at Annexure-8, Mr.Baug, learned counsel for the Petitioner alleged that even though the Appeal has been admitted and the order dated 6.5.2022 even disclosed admission of the I.A. but there has been no order on the Application under Order 39 rule 3 of C.P.C. and the case is now posted to 23.6.2022. It is claimed, if in the meantime, any action taken involving tender involved, all these Applications will become infructuous.

4. Considering the allegation made and as this Court finds, on admission of the Appeal, nothing prevented the District Judge to pass order in accordance with law on the Application under Order Page 1 of 2 // 2 // 39 Rule 3 of C.P.C. and should not have merely admitted such Application. This Court in disposal of the C.M.P. observes, in the event the Petitioner moves an Application for expediting hearing of the Application under Order 39 Rule 3 of C.P.C. and a decision thereon, the same shall be considered and order, as appropriate, shall be passed at an early date even in vacation court.

5. The CMP stands disposed of accordingly.

6. Issue urgent certified copy.

(Biswanath Rath) Judge M.K.Rout Page 2 of 2