Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 4]

Kerala High Court

Joby John vs The District Collector

Author: A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai

Bench: A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                               PRESENT:

                  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI

             WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/21ST SRAVANA, 1937

                                   WP(C).No. 2903 of 2015 (K)
                                   ----------------------------------------

PETITIONER(S):
-----------------------

        1. JOBY JOHN, AGED 36 YEARS,
            S/O.LATE C.V.JOHN, CHERUPILLIYIL HOUSE
            PANNIYAMKARA P.O, PANTHALAPPADAM, VADAKKANCHERRY
            ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

        2. MUBEENA, AGED 38 YEARS,
            W/O.ABDUL AMANULLA, MANAPPADAM HOUSE, MANAPPADAM POST,
            PUDUKKODE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

            BY ADV. SRI.P.K.MOHANAN(PALAKKAD)

RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------------

        1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
            PALAKKAD REVENUE DISTRICT, CIVIL STATION,
            PALAKKAD - 678 001.

        2. THE TARUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH BOARD,
            REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, P.O TARUR,
            PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678 547.

        3. THE SECRETARY
           TARUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, P.O TARUR,
            PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678 547.

            R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.ANITHA RAVEENDRAN
            R2 & R3 BY ADVS. SRI.G.D.PANICKER
                                  SMT.JEENA JOSEPH


            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
            12-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:




msv/

WP(C).No. 2903 of 2015 (K)
--------------------------------------

                                          APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-------------------------------------

EXHIBIT P1: ATRUE COPY OF THE PANCHAYATH LICENSE DATED 31.12.13 ISSUED TO
                 THE FIRST PETITIONER WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF THE SAME.

EXHIBIT P2: ATRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 28.02.14 ISSUED REGARDING
                  THE REMITTANCE OF D & O TRADE LICENSE FEE BY THE FIRST
                  PETITIONER TO TARUR PANCHAYATH.

EXHIBIT P3: ATRUE COPY OF THE BANKERS CHEQUE DATED 06.05.14 FOR RS.10,220
                  DRAWN ON STATE BANK OF INDIA, CIVIL STATION BRANCH, PALAKKAD
                  EVIDENCING REMITTANCE OF RENEWAL FEE TO KERALA STATE
                  POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD BY THE IST PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P4: ATRUE COPY OF THE PANCHAYATH LICENSE DATED 10.02.14 ISSUED TO
                 THE 2ND PETITIONER WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF THE SAME.

EXHIBIT P5: ATRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 28.02.14 ISSUED BY THE TARUR
                  PANCYAYATH SECRETARY TO THE SECOND PETITIONER WITH RESPECT
                  TO THE REMITTANCE OF D & O TRADE LICENSE FEE.

EXHIBIT P6: ATRUE COPY OF THE BANKERS CHEQUE DATED 12.05.14 FOR RS.4,975
                  DRAWN ON STATE BANK OF INDIA, CIVIL STATION BRANCH, PALAKKAD
                  EVIDENCE OF RENEWAL FEE TO KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL
                  BOARD BY THE SECOND PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P7: ATRUE COPY OF THE STOP MEMO ISSUED TO THE FIRST PETITIONER
                  BY THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY STATING THAT HE IS IN CHARGE OF
                  THE SECRETARY OF TARUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH WITH ENGLISH
                  TRANSLATION OF THE SAME.

EXHIBIT P8: ATRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM DATED 23.12.14
                  SUBMITTED BEFORE THE TARUR GRAMA PANCYAYATH BY THE FIRST
                  PETITIONER WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF THE SAME.

EXHIBIT P9: ATRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM DATED 23.12.14
                  PRESENTED BEFORE THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD BY THE
                  FIRST PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P10: ATRUE COPY OF THE STOP MEMO DATED 17.12.14 ISSUED TO THE
                   SECOND PETITIONER BY THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF TARUR
                   PANCHAYATH STATING THAT HE IS HOLDING THE CHARGE OF THE
                   SECRETARY WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF THE SAME.

EXHIBIT P11: ATRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM DATED 23.12.14
                  SUBMITTED TO THE PANCHAYATH BOARD BY THE SECOND
                  PETITIONER WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF THE SAME.

Msv/

                                                                             -2-

                                               -2-

WP(C).No. 2903 of 2015 (K)
--------------------------------------


EXHIBIT P12: ATRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM DATED 23.12.14
                   SUBMITTED TO THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD BY THE
                   SECOND PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P13: ATRUE COPY OF THE STAY APPLICATION DTD.24.1.2015 FILED BY THE
                  1ST PETITIONER U/S 276 (2) OF THE KERALA PANCHAYATH RAJ ACT
                  BEFORE THE TARUR PANCHAYATH RECEIVED AND ACKNOWLEDGED
                  BY THE PANCHAYATH ON 28.1.2015 WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF
                  THE SAME.

EXHIBIT P14: ATRUE COPY OF THE STAY APPLICATION DTD.24.1.2015 FILED BY THE
                  2ND PETITIONER MUBEENA, W/O.ABDUL AMANULLA U/S 276 (2) OF THE
                  KERALA PANCHAYATH RAJ ACT 1994 BEFORE THE TARUR PANCHAYATH
                  RECEIVED AND ACKNOWLEDGED BY THE PANCHAYATH ON 28.1.2015
                  WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF THE SAME.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
-----------------------------------------
                                            NIL

                                                     //TRUE COPY//


                                                     P.S.TO JUDGE.


Msv/



                 A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.
                   = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                       W.P(C) No.2903 of 2015
                 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                Dated this the 12thday of August, 2015

                            JUDGMENT

The petitioners are seeking a direction for a time bound disposal of the statutory appeals submitted by them before the second respondent.

2. The Assistant Secretary of the respondent panchayat stating that he is in charge of the Secretary, issued stop memos to the petitioners directing them to close their small scale industrial units functioning in the industrial area notified by the Government. The petitioners allege that they have not been heard and the order is not reasoned. Therefore, they filed statutory appeals under Section 276 of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act before the panchayat board and the same is pending. The petitioners further allege that the stop memos issued by the Assistant Secretary are per se illegal. It is with this background, the petitioners have come up before this Court. WP(C)2903/15 -:2:-

3. Arguments have been heard.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners confined his argument to the limited prayer for a direction to the respondents to consider and dispose of Exts.P8 and P11 appeals after hearing the petitioners and affected parties, if any within a time frame.

Considering the nature of the submission and the nature of the relief sought for, this writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Exts.P8 and P11 appeals filed by the petitioners after affording them and affected parties, if any, an opportunity of being heard within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Till that exercise is completed, the present state of affairs shall continue.

Sd/-

A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE krj