Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Rajiv Kumar Dixit vs State Of Rajasthan . on 26 September, 2014

Author: A.K. Sikri

Bench: A.K. Sikri

         ITEM NO.17                          COURT NO.6                 SECTION XV

                                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F       I N D I A
                                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

         Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)               No(s).   18476/2012

         (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 30/05/2012
         in DBCSA No. 749/2012,30/05/2012 in SBCWP No. 488/2012 passed by
         the High Court Of Rajasthan At Jaipur)

         RAJIV KUMAR DIXIT                                               Petitioner(s)

                                                    VERSUS

         STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.                                       Respondent(s)

         (office report on default)

         Date : 26/09/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today.

         CORAM :
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI
                                               [IN CHAMBER]

         For Petitioner(s)              Mr. G.S. Mani, Adv.
                                        Mr. R. Sathish,Adv.

         For Respondent(s)              Mr. Naveen Kr. Chawla, Adv.
                                        Mr. R.S. Chauhan, Adv.
                                        Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv.

                                        Mr. Ram Naresh Yadav, Adv.
                                        Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Adv.
                                        Ms. Pragati Neekhra,Adv.

                              UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                  O R D E R

On oral request made by learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent nos. 5 and 8 are deleted from the array of parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that they are only proforma respondents since they were themselves the petitioners in the writ petition before the High Court. The names of Respondent nos. 5 and 8 are deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioner.

Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by
Deepak Mansukhani

         (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI)                                  (INDU BALA KAPUR)
Date: 2014.09.27
13:43:55 IST
Reason:

          COURT MASTER                                         COURT MASTER