Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Simens Ltd vs The Commissioner Of Central ... on 7 January, 2020

Author: M.S. Karnik

Bench: Nitin Jamdar, M.S. Karnik

skn                                  1           907-919-235.13-cexa--.doc




      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
         ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

            CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 235 OF 2013

Prakash Parakh.                            ...       Appellant.
      V/s.
The Commissioner of Central Excise.        ...       Respondent.

                            WITH
            CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 285 OF 2013
                            WITH
            CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 131 OF 2014
                            WITH
            CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 18 OF 2015
                            WITH
            CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 88 OF 2014
                            WITH
            CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 90 OF 2014
                            WITH
            CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 93 OF 2014
                            WITH
            CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 94 OF 2014
                            WITH
            CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 97 OF 2014
                            WITH
            CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 99 OF 2014
                            WITH
            CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 81 OF 2015
                            WITH
            CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 51 OF 2016
                            WITH
            CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 82 OF 2016
                            WITH
            CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 75 OF 2018




      ::: Uploaded on - 17/01/2020       ::: Downloaded on - 08/06/2020 00:08:23 :::
 skn                                   2                        907-919-235.13-cexa--.doc




Mr.Viraj Y. Bhate for the Appellant in CEXA Nos.235 & 285/2013,
131, 88, 93, 94, 97 & 99/2017, 18, 81 & 82/2015 and 51/2016.
Mr.Gaurav Gangal i/b. M/s.Crawford Bayley & Co. for the Appellant
in CEXA No.75/2015.
Mr.Vipul Bajpayee for the Respondent in CEXA Nos.235 & 285/13.
K.Godbole i/b. Amol Joshi for the Respondent in CEXA No.18/15.
Mr.Sham Walve for the Respondent in CEXA Nos.88, 93, 94,
97/2014 and 81/2015.
Mr.Sham Walve with Maya Muzumdar for the Respondent in CEXA
No.75/2015.


                CORAM :              NITIN JAMDAR AND
                                     M.S. KARNIK, JJ.
                DATE :               7 January 2020.

P.C. :

The learned counsel for the Appellants in all these appeals state that the Appellants have approached under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. They, therefore, seek leave to withdraw these appeals.

2. All the appeals are disposed of as withdrawn.

(M.S. KARNIK, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.) ::: Uploaded on - 17/01/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 08/06/2020 00:08:23 :::