Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Rajaram vs The State Of Rajasthan on 2 December, 2020

Bench: N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant, Aniruddha Bose

                                                     1

     ITEM NO.12                    Court 2 (Video Conferencing)           SECTION II

                                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                         Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)   No.3559/2020

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19­12­2019
     in SBCRMFBA No. 15507/2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature
     for Rajasthan at Jaipur)

     RAJARAM                                                           Petitioner(s)

                                                    VERSUS

     THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN                                            Respondent(s)

     (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.)

     Date : 02­12­2020 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE

     For Petitioner(s)
                                       Mr. Nishant Bishnoi, Adv.
                                       Mr. Saurabh Ajay Gupta, AOR
     For Respondent(s)
                                       Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv.
                                       Mr. Sandeep Kumar Jha, AOR

                              UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                 O R D E R

The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Dr. Manish Singhvi, learned Senior counsel appearing for the respondent – State of Rajasthan.

Taking into consideration the age of the petitioner who is 60 Signature Not Verified years old, his period of incarceration which is around four years Digitally signed by Vishal Anand Date: 2020.12.02 and his poor health condition, we are inclined to enlarge the 17:48:23 IST Reason:

petitioner on bail.
2
The petitioner is, accordingly, directed to be enlarged on bail on such terms and conditions which the concerted Trial Court shall deem fit and appropriate to impose upon him. However, we clarify that the order has been passed in the given facts of the case and not to be treated as precedent.
If the petitioner violates any condition of bail, the State of Rajasthan would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of bail which is being granted today by us. The Special Leave Petition is disposed of in the afore­stated terms.
  (VISHAL ANAND)                                          (BEENA JOLLY)
ASTT. REGISTRAR­cum­PS                                   COURT MASTER (NSH)