Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

S.P.Patil Account Officer And Ors vs The State Of Karnatka And Anr on 7 August, 2014

Author: N.Ananda

Bench: N.Ananda

                              1




        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                   GULBARGA BENCH

        DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST 2014

                          BEFORE

           THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANANDA

        CRIMINAL PETITION No.200575/2014
BETWEEN:

1.   S.P. Patil
     Account Officer
     Panchayat Raj Engineering Division
     Gulbarga - 585 103.
2.   Arunkumar
     Technical Assistant (Junior Engineer)
     Panchayat Raj Engineering
     Division, Gulbarga - 585 103.
3.   Chandrashekar Nashi
     Technical Assistant (Junior Engineer)
     Panchayat Raj Engineering Division,
     Gulbarga - 585 103.                   ...PETITIONERS
(By Sri V.N. Madavareddy, Advocate)

AND:

1.     The State of Karnataka
       Through University Police Station
       Gulbarga - 585 105
       Rept. by Addl. SPP

2.    Chief Executive Officer,
      Zilla Panchayat, Gulbarga - 585 102.
                                         ... RESPONDENTS
(By Sri S.S. Aspalli, HCGP)
                                  2




      This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482
Cr.P.C., praying to quash the proceedings in Crime
No.264/2013, filed by the University Police Station,
Gulbarga, which is pending on the file of the III Addl. Civil
Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Gulbarga, for offences p/u/ss
409, 420, 468, 471 r/w 34 IPC and etc.

     This Petition coming on for orders this day, the court
made the following:
                        ORDER

Heard.

2. The only grievance of learned counsel for petitioners is that petitioners are required to appear before the learned Special Judge on every date of hearing till the final report is filed.

3. The attendance of accused on every date of hearing before the Special Judge till the final report is filed, may not serve any useful purpose. In the circumstances, petitioners are at liberty to file necessary application before the learned Special Judge seeking exemption of their appearance till the final report is filed.

4. The petition is disposed off with these observations.

Sd/-

JUDGE Np/-