Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Patna High Court - Orders

The State Of Bihar & Ors vs Most. Sonamati Devi & Ors on 26 September, 2014

Author: Anjana Mishra

Bench: Anjana Mishra

                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  Letters Patent Appeal No.1043 of 2014
                                                     In
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9498 of 2013
                 ======================================================
                 The State Of Bihar & Ors
                                                                      .... .... Appellants
                                                  Versus
                 Most. Sonamati Devi & Ors
                                                                     .... .... Respondents
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellant/s     :   Dr. Anil Kumar Uadphyay, Advocate.
                 For the Respondent/s     : Mr. Madhuresh Prasad, Advocate.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI
                           and
                           HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA
                 ORAL ORDER
                 (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI)

5   26-09-2014

I.A. No. 5356 of 2014 has been filed by the appellants, under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, seeking condonation of delay of 90 days in preferring the present letters patent appeal against the order, dated 03.03.2014, passed by the learned single Judge in C.W.J.C. No. 9498 of 2013.

Heard Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the appellants, and Mr. S. S. Tiwary, appearing for respondent No.1. Heard also Mr. Madhuresh Prasad, learned Counsel, appearing for respondent No. 2.

Having considered the reasons assigned in the present limitation petition and having heard the learned counsel for the parties, this Court is satisfied that the appellants were prevented by sufficient causes from preferring the appeal within time. Patna High Court LPA No.1043 of 2014 (5) dt.26-09-2014 2/2

In view of the above, the delay of 90 days, in preferring the letters patent appeal, is hereby condoned.

I.A. No. 5356 of 2014 shall stand disposed of. Let this appeal come up, under the heading 'For Admission-I'.





                                                   (I. A. Ansari, J.)


    Mkr./-                                      (Anjana Mishra, J.)


U