Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 1]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Shakuntla Devi Etc vs Avinash Sharma Etc on 15 February, 2018

Author: Rekha Mittal

Bench: Rekha Mittal

FAO-6040-2014 (O&M)                                                             -1-


       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                      CHANDIGARH

                                                         FAO-6040-2014 (O&M)
                                                     Date of decision: 15.02.2018

SHAKUNTLA DEVI ETC                                       ... Appellants

                                    Versus

AVINASH SHARMA ETC                                       ... Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE REKHA MITTAL

Present :    Ms. Ekta Thakur, Advocate for the appellants.

             Mr. Rajesh K. Sharma, Advocate for the insurance company.

        ****
REKHA MITTAL, J. (Oral)

The claimants are in appeal seeking enhancement of compensation on account of death of Phoolan Devi in a motor vehicular accident that took place on 21.03.2012.

The Tribunal has awarded compensation of Rs.2,15,000/-, detailed hereunder:-

1. Monthly loss of services of the deceased Rs.3000/-
2. Multiplier 5
3. Deduction for personal expenses 50%
4. Loss of dependency Rs.90,000/-
5. Expenses on funeral Rs.25,000/-
6. Loss of consortium Rs.1,00,000/-

Counsel for the appellants has submitted that the Tribunal has wrongly allowed deduction for personal expenses as loss of dependency has been assessed qua services of the deceased as a housewife.

Counsel for the insurance company has submitted that 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 04-03-2018 13:54:45 ::: FAO-6040-2014 (O&M) -2- compensation allowed under conventional heads needs modification in the light of latest judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Pranay Sethi and Ors., 2017 SCC 1270.

The deceased was approximately 80 years old but there is nothing on record suggestive of the fact that she was not able to perform household duties and carry on domestic affairs. As the Tribunal has assessed value of her services as a house maker, no deduction for personal expenses is to be allowed in the light of Division Bench judgment of this Court Paramjit Singh and another Vs. Dilbagh Singh @ Bagga and others, 2013(3) Law Herald 2730. The multiplier applied by the Tribunal is affirmed. In this manner, loss of dependency comes to Rs.1,80,000/- (Rs.3000 x 12 x 5).

Under conventional heads, compensation awarded by the Tribunal is modified and the claimants are allowed Rs.55,000/- i.e. Rs.40,000/- for loss of consortium and Rs.15,000/- for expenses on funeral.

Total compensation is Rs.2,35,000/- and the additional amount is Rs.20,000/- (2,35,000 - 2,15,000), payable with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of petition till realization to husband of the deceased.

The appeal is partly allowed in the aforesaid terms.





15.02.2018                                         (REKHA MITTAL)
ashok                                                  JUDGE
        Whether speaking/reasoned:          Yes / No
        Whether reportable:                 Yes / No




                                          2 of 2
                       ::: Downloaded on - 04-03-2018 13:54:48 :::