Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Ahsan @ Mansur Hasan Khan vs Salim Hasan Khan And 4 Ors on 2 December, 2021

Author: N. J. Jamadar

Bench: N. J. Jamadar

                                                                                   26-ia-1518-2021.doc




                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                                         INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1518 OF 2021
         Digitally
         signed by
         SHRADDHA
                                                        WITH
SHRADDHA KAMLESH
KAMLESH TALEKAR                          INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2833 OF 2021
TALEKAR
                                                          IN
         Date:
         2021.12.03
         18:20:26
         +0530
                                                 SUIT NO. 154 OF 2015

                      Ahsan @ Mansur Hasan Khan                     ...Applicant

                      In the matter between :

                      Ahsan @ Mansur Hasan Khan                     ...Plaintiff
                      Versus
                      1. Salim Hasan Khan & Ors.                    ...Defendants

                                                        WITH
                                                 SUIT NO. 498 OF 2016
                                                        WITH
                                                        WITH
                                         INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2833 OF 2021
                                                          IN
                                                 SUIT NO. 498 OF 2016
                                                        WITH
                                           NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 867 OF 2016
                                                        WITH
                                          NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2271 OF 2016
                                                          IN
                                                 SUIT NO. 154 OF 2015
                                                        WITH
                                           NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 567 OF 2017
                                                          IN
                                             COUNTERCLAIM NO. 10 OF 2017

                      Mr.Akshay Kapadia i/b Mr.Rahul S. Kadam for applicant/plaintiff.

                      Mr. Atul Daga, a/w Mrs. Rashna Khan, Ms. Poorva Garg, i/b
                      Mulla & Mulla & CBC, for defendant No.1 in Suit/154/2015.

                      Mr. A.K. Millwala i/b Mr. Hafeezur Rahman, for defendant Nos.3 &
                      4 in CC/10/17.

                      Shraddha Talekar, PS                                                       1/3
                                                                26-ia-1518-2021.doc




Ms. Shruti Maniar a/w. Ms. Shivani Bhandary i/b Solomon & Co.
for defendant No.3 in IA/1518/21.

Mr.Prasad Dhande a/w. Mr. Amit Khairnar                   i/b D.H. Law
Associates for defendant No.5.

Mr. Nooruddin Dhilla a/w. Ms. Aishwarya Wagle i/b M/s. Hariani
and Co. for defendant Nos.1 to 3 in S/498/2018.

Mr. H.R. Patel, Master (Admn.) of Court Receiver present.

                        CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, JJ.

DATE : 2nd DECEMBER , 2021 P.C.:

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1518 OF 2021
1. Heard Mr.Kapadia, the learned Counsel for the applicant-

plaintiff and Mr.Daga, the learned counsel for the defendant No.1.

2. Mr.Daga, the learned counsel for defendant No.1 submits that in terms of the order dated 21 st October 2021, the draft Leave and License agreements are yet to be shared by the Telecom Companies. Mr. Daga further submits that defendant No.1 has filed an affidavit as regards the outstanding amount of municipal taxes/charges in respect of Sakinaka property.

3. The learned counsel for the plaintiff seeks time to take instructions as regards the averments in the affidavit.

4. Let the plaintiff respond to the affidavit of the defendant No.1 as regards the outstanding amount of municipal taxes/charges.

Shraddha Talekar, PS 2/3

26-ia-1518-2021.doc

5. In the meanwhile, the plaintiff and defendant No.1, who are before the Court, shall take necessary steps to execute fresh agreements with the respective Telecom Companies in terms of paragraph 4 of the order dated 21st October 2021.

6. List on 17th December 2021.

( N. J. JAMADAR, J. ) Shraddha Talekar, PS 3/3