Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Sunita Sharma on 3 September, 2020

Bench: D.Y. Chandrachud, Indu Malhotra, K.M. Joseph

     SLP(C) 9515/2020
                                                             1

     ITEM NO.4                           Court 3 (Video Conferencing)                 SECTION IV-B

                                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F             I N D I A
                                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)                          No.9515/2020

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-12-2019
     in FAO No. 908/2016 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at
     Chandigarh)


     NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD                                                  Petitioner(s)

                                                            VERSUS

     SUNITA SHARMA & ORS.                                                        Respondent(s)

     (For interim relief)


     Date : 03-09-2020 This petition was called on for hearing today.


     CORAM :
                                  HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
                                  HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA
                                  HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH


     For Petitioner(s)                   Mr. Abhishek Gola, Adv.
                                         Mr. Viresh B. Saharya, AOR
                                         Mr. Akshat Agarwal, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)


                                UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                    O R D E R

1 Mr Abhishek Gola, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has stated on instructions that an amount of Rs 43.5 lakhs has been paid over to the respondent in satisfaction of the award as modified by the High Court and, if any balance remains due and payable, that shall be paid over within a Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by period of six weeks from today. ARJUN BISHT Date: 2020.09.03 19:22:13 IST Reason: SLP(C) 9515/2020 2 2 Mr Gola states that though the payment of the amount has been made to the respondent, the correctness of the decision of the High Court in Kamla Devi vs Sahib Singh [FAO No.3064 of 2013], which has been followed in the impugned judgment, needs to be resolved finally since the issue is of a recurring nature.

3 Issue notice, returnable in six weeks.

     (CHETAN KUMAR)                                     (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR)
       AR-cum-PS                                           BRANCH OFFICER