Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Aditi Ajaykumar Choksi vs State Of Gujarat & on 24 December, 2014

Author: J.B.Pardiwala

Bench: J.B.Pardiwala

          R/SCR.A/4834/2014                                   JUDGMENT




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

    SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (QUASHING) NO. 4834 of 2014
                                     With
               CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 21576 of 2014


FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:



HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA

================================================================

1   Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see
    the judgment ?

2   To be referred to the Reporter or not ?

3   Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the
    judgment ?

4   Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as
    to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 or any
    order made thereunder ?

5   Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?

================================================================
                     ADITI AJAYKUMAR CHOKSI....Applicant(s)
                                   Versus
                     STATE OF GUJARAT & 1....Respondent(s)
================================================================
Appearance in SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (QUASHING) NO. 4834
of 2014
MR B.B.NAIK, SENIOR ADVOCATE with MR. JAIMIN R DAVE, ADVOCATE
for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR P B KHAMBHOLJA, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR AN SHAH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1

Appearance in CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 21576 of 2014
MR P B KHAMBHOLJA, ADVOCATE for the Applicant (s) No. 1-2



                                    Page 1 of 3
         R/SCR.A/4834/2014                                     JUDGMENT



MR AN SHAH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MR B.B.NAIK, SENIOR ADVOCATE with MR. JAIMIN R DAVE, ADVOCATE
for the Respondent No.2
================================================================

         CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA

                              Date : 24/12/2014


                            ORAL ORAL JUDGMENT

1. Since,   both   these   applications   arise   from   a   cross   First  Information Report, those were heard analogously and are being  disposed of by this common judgment and order.

2. Rule returnable forthwith.   Mr.Shah, the learned APP waives  service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent no.1 ­  State of Gujarat. 

3. In   Criminal   Misc.   Application   No.21576   of   2014,  Mr.B.B.Naik,   the   learned   Senior   Advocate   assisted   by   Mr.Jaimin  Dave,   the   learned   advocate   has   appeared   on   behalf   of   the  respondent   No.2   -   original   informant.   In   Special   Criminal  Application   No.4834   of   2014,   Mr.P.B.Khambholja,   the   learned  advocate   has   appeared   on   behalf   of   respondent   No.2   -   original  informant and waive service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of  the respondent no.2. 

4. It appears that the parties had an altercation on account of a  very trivial issue.   The quarrel between the two ladies led to the  filing of the two FIRs being C.R.No.II­3292 of 2014 for the offence  punishable under Sections 323, 294(b) and 351 of the Indian Penal  Page 2 of 3 R/SCR.A/4834/2014 JUDGMENT Code and C.R.No.II­3293 of 2014 for the offence punishable under  Sections 323 and 294(B) of the Indian Penal Code, both registered  with the Ellisbridge Police Station, Ahmedabad

5. Taking into consideration the nature of the dispute and the  fact that the two young ladies had an altercation and fight on a  very petty issue, they have decided to bury their differences and  resolve the dispute.  They are present before the Court and they are  being identified by their respective learned advocates.  

6. In   the  result,  both  these  applications  are  allowed.  The  FIR  being   C.R.No.II­3292   of   2014   and   FIR   being   C.R.No.II­3293   of  2014   both   registered   with   the   Ellisbridge   Police   Station,  Ahmedabad are ordered to be quashed.   Consequently, all further  proceedings pursuant to the FIRs shall also stand terminated.  

7. Rule is made absolute in both these petitions. 

(J.B.PARDIWALA, J.) Amar Page 3 of 3