Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Laxman Singh vs State Of Rajasthan on 21 February, 2022

Author: Arun Bhansali

Bench: Arun Bhansali

     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
              S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2696/2022

1.     Laxman Singh S/o Sardar Singh, Aged About 75 Years,
       Village Post Ranikalan Tehsil Rani District Pali Rajasthan
2.     Sukhlal Madhukar S/o Kesav Ram, Aged About 71 Years,
       Village Post Sindarli Tehsil Desuri District Pali Rajasthan
       Retired On The Post Of Mpw
3.     Datar Singh S/o Virad Singh, Aged About 68 Years,
       Village Post Sandara Tehsil Bali District Pali Rajasthan
       Retired On The Post Of Mpw
4.     Himmat Ram S/o Daya Ram, Aged About 70 Years,
       Megwalo       Ka    Bas     Bhati      Mohalla       Sadri     District   Pali
       Rajasthan Retired On The Of Mpw
5.     Bheema Shanker S/o Murlidhar Vyas, Aged About 71
       Years, Rawla Chowk Brahmpuri Chanod District Pali
       Rajasthan Retired On The Post Of Mpw
6.     Manaram S/o Vana, Aged About 68 Years, Megwalo Ka
       Bas Bhati Mohalla Sadri District Pali Rajasthan Retired On
       The Post Of Mpw
                                                                     ----Petitioners
                                    Versus
1.     State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary To The
       Government,         Department           Of     Medical       And    Health,
       Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.     The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary
       Department         Of   Medical      And Heatlh           Government       Of
       Rajasthan Jaipur.
3.     The Director (Administration), The Department Of Medical
       And Health Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
4.     The   Chief    Medical       And      Health       Officer,    District   Pali
       Rajasthan.
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Ripudaman Singh.
For Respondent(s)          :



           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI
(Downloaded on 21/02/2022 at 08:56:14 PM)
                                          (2 of 3)                [CW-2696/2022]

                                    Order

21/02/2022

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the matter is squarely covered by the judgment passed by this Hon'ble Court in Dadam Das Vaishnav Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8309/2012, decided on 20.05.2013. The judgment reads as under :-

"The petitioner entered in the services of the respondents, being appointed as Multipurpose Health Worker (Male) under the order dated 11.2.1991 in the pay-scale of Rs.950-1520. As a consequent to the amendment introduced in Rajasthan Civil Services (Revised Pay-scale) Rules, 1989, the pay-scale of Rs.950-1680 was allowed to the petitioner while serving as Multipurpose Health Worker (Male). The respondents vide order dated 13.3.2002 allowed pay- scale of Rs.3200-4900 as first selection grade w.e.f. 19.2.2000. The grievance of the petitioner is that instead of the pay-scale of Rs.3200-4900, pay-scale of Rs.4000-6000 should have been as the first selection grade. It is submitted that the petitioner is holding an isolated post, therefore, selection grade should have been allowed to him as per para-5 of the Government of Rajasthan circular dated 25.1.1992 and its subsequent order dated 17.2.1998.
A reply to the writ petition has been filed on behalf of the respondents stating therein that the petitioner, though, was working as Multipurpose Health Worker (Male), but that is not a post isolated one, as such, the pay-scale was allowed to him pertaining to the first promotional post.
Heard.
The post of Health Worker (Male) (Ordinary Scale) is prescribed under the Rajasthan Medical & Health Subordinate Service Rules, 1965. Appointment to this post is required to be made 100% by way of direct recruitment. Under the Rules aforesaid, no promotion avenue was available to the Multipurpose Health Worker (Male) on the day the petitioner became (Downloaded on 21/02/2022 at 08:56:14 PM) (3 of 3) [CW-2696/2022] entitled to have the first selection grade, as such selection grade is required to be given to the petitioner as per para-5 of the Government of Rajasthan circular dated 17.2.1998. Under the notification aforesaid, the pay-scale applicable for the petitioner is Rs.4000-6000.

The respondents, therefore, erroneously made fixation of the petitioner's pay in the pay-scale of Rs.3200- 4900 after awarding first selection grade.

As a matter of fact, the issue involved in this petition for writ has already been adjudicated earlier in the case of Asha Ram & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5333/2006 decided on 17.5.2013).

Having considered all the facts of the case, this petition for writ for the reasons given deserves to be accepted. Accordingly, the same is allowed. The respondents are directed to allow first selection grade to the petitioner in the pay-scale of Rs.4000-6000 w.e.f. 11.2.1991 and second & third selection grades in terms of para-5 of the circulars dated 25.1.1992 and 17.2.1998. No order as to costs."

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners shall be satisfied if their representations are decided by the respondents in light of the aforequoted precedent law of Dadam Das Vaishnav (supra).

In light of the aforequoted judgment, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioners in terms of aforementioned precedent law within a period of 30 days from today strictly in accordance with law.

(ARUN BHANSALI),J 74-Sumit/-

(Downloaded on 21/02/2022 at 08:56:14 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)