Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 47, Cited by 4]

Gujarat High Court

M H Khanusiya vs State Of Gujarat on 15 June, 2018

Author: B.N. Karia

Bench: M.R. Shah, B.N. Karia

       C/SCA/5379/2016                                        CAV JUDGMENT



             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

               SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION  NO. 5379 of 2016
                                  With 
               SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7844 of 2016
 
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE: 
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH                      sd/­
and
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA                     sd/­
=========================================

1      Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see  No the judgment ?

2      To be referred to the Reporter or not ?                               No

3      Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the              No
       judgment ?

4      Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as           No

to the interpretation of the Constitution of India or any  order made thereunder ?

============================================= M H KHANUSIYA....Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT  &  1....Respondent(s) ============================================= Appearance:

MR UCHIT N SHETH, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR. HARDIK VORA AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 1 - 2 Special Civil Application No.7844 of 2016 MR. S.N. SOPARKAR, Senior Advocate  for Singhi & Co. for the petitioner  MR. HARDIK VORA AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ============================================= CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA  Date : 15/06/2018  CAV JUDGMENT   (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH) 1.0. By   way   of   this   petition   being   Special   Civil   Application  No.5379 of 2016 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the  petitioner   has   prayed   for   appropriate   writ,   direction   and   order  Page 1 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT quashing   and   setting   aside   the   impugned   demand   notice   dated  20.02.2016. The petitioner has also prayed for an appropriate writ,  direction   and   order   to   quash   and   set   aside   the   impugned  assessment order dated 13.06.2016. 
1.1. The petitioner has also prayed for appropriate writ, direction  and order permanently restraining the respondent from recovering  the entry tax or penalty under the Entry Tax Act on purchase of  Hydraulic Excavator made on 29.09.2016.  2.0. So   far   as   Special   Civil   Application   No.7844   of   2016   is  concerned, the petitioner has also prayed to quash and set aside the  impugned   notices   for   payment   of   tax   issued   in   Form   ­3   dated  13.04.2016 passed by the respondent no.2 herein. The petitioner  has also prayed to quash and set aside the impugned notices for  assessment  issued in Form ­2 dated 13.04.2016 by the respondent  no.2.   The   petitioner   has  also   prayed   to  quash   and   set   aside   the  impugned   notices   for   demand   dated   13.04.2016   issued   by   the  respondent no.3 to the petitioner.

Special Civil Application No.5379 of 2016  3.0. The facts leading to the present Special Civil Application  No.5379 of 2016 in nutshell are as under:

3.1. That the petitioner is a proprietorship firm and works a  contractor   engaged   in   road   construction.   That   the   petitioner   is  registered   under   VAT   Act.   That   on   29.09.2006   the   petitioner  purchased   a   hydraulic   excavator   for   use   in   execution   for   works  contract.   According   to   the   petitioner,   the   purchase   was   duly  recorded   in   the   books   of   accounts.   According   to   the   petitioner,  Page 2 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT hydraulic excavator is a machine mounted on chains and not on  rubber tyres. Therefore, according to the petitioner, the petitioner  believed   that   such   machine   was   not   "specified   goods"   for   the  purpose   of   entry   tax   and   hence   it   did   not   pay   entry   tax   at   the  relevant   time   on   such   machine.   That   after   a   period   of  approximately 12 years, in the year 2016, the petitioner received  one inquiry from the respondent authorities as to whether entry tax  was   paid   on   the   hydraulic   excavator   which   was   purchased   on  29.09.2006.   That   by   written   submission   dated   25.1.2016,   the  petitioner submitted that hydraulic excavator was a machine used  in   execution   of   works   contract   and   hence   it   was   not   "specified  goods", no entry tax has been paid on such purchase. It was also  contended that assessment of entry tax in respect of such purchase  was   time   barred   by   now.   That   the   respondent   authority   issued  notice dated 30.01.2016 issued in Form 401 asking the petitioner  to submit challan showing payment of entry tax. That vide notice  dated 1.2.2016 Commercial Tax Officer issued notice proposing to  impose entry tax. The notice to impose entry tax was issued under  Section   34(8)  of   the  VAT  Act.   That   the   petitioner  submitted  the  reply   to  the   notice   on  5.2.2016   wherein   again  it  was  contended  that hydraulic  excavator  was  not  "specified goods"  and also  that  assessment  of   entry   tax  for  goods   purchased  on   29.09.2006   was  time barred. It is the case on behalf of the petitioner that thereafter  without passing any assessment order, the respondent authorities  have   issued   the   impugned   demand   notice   to   the   petitioner   on  20.02.2016   asking   the   petitioner   to   deposit   entry   tax   on   the  purchase   made   on   29.09.2006   along   with   penal   interest   and  penalty.   Vide   communication   dated   24.02.2016   the   petitioner  Page 3 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT requested respondent authority to reconsider its decision. However,  nothing further was done and the respondent authorities continue  to demand  the  entry tax  on the  purchase  of  hydraulic  excavator  purchased   in   the   year   2006.   Hence,   the   petitioner   has   preferred  present   Special   Civil   Application     under   Article   226   of   the  Constitution of India. 

Special Civil Application No. 7844 of 2016  4.0. The   facts   leading   to   the   present   Special   Civil   Application  No.7844 of 2016 in nutshell are as under:

4.1. That the petitioner Ultratech Cement Limited   purchased  the following equipment from the respective vendors.
                                                  Received     Amount 
       Equipment               Invoice
                                                  Date         (in Rs.)

 Tata - Hitachi           Invoice No.     23.04.2012 1,20,33,756/­
 Hydraulic                27462419 dated 
 excavator model          30.03.2012
 ZX450H with 
 Loading Shovel

 Tata - Hitachi           Invoice No.     02.04.2012 1,18,13,130/­
 Hydraulic                27462291 dated 
 excavator model          29.02.2012
 ZX450H with 
 Loading Shovel

 Hydraulic                Invoice No.             27.11.2014 1,42,88,262/­
 Excavator L&T            911402203 
 300D                     dated 
                          30.09.2014


4.2. That on  06.04.2016, pursuant to instructions received from  the Respondent No. 1­ Joint Commissioner of Tax, the Respondent  Page 4 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT No. 3­ Commercial Tax Officer, Amreli conducted a search/survey  at the premises of the Petitioner under the provisions of the Gujarat  Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and the rules framed thereunder. That  on the very same day i.e. on   06.04.2016, a notice in Form­401,  under Section 6770 and 70A of the VAT Act, came to be issued to  the Petitioner, seeking an explanation from the Petitioner qua the  failure on payment of Entry Tax on the equipment purchased by  the Petitioner, in 2011­12 and 2013­14. That on   12.04.2016, the  representative   of   the   Petitioner   appeared   before   the   Respondent  No. 3, and inter alia submitted that the aforesaid equipment not  being   Motor   Vehicles   in   terms   of   the   Gujarat   Tax   on   Entry   of  Specified Goods into Local Areas Act, 2001 ("Entry Tax Act") was  not amenable to Entry Tax and therefore there arose no liability on  the  Petitioner  to  make   payment   of  Entry  Tax  on   the  equipment. 

Pursuant   to   the   aforesaid,   the   Respondent   No.   3,   while   issuing  notice   dated   13.04.2016   for   assessment   under   Form­2   of   the  Gujarat  Tax on Entry of Specified Goods into Local Areas Rules,  2001 ("Entry Tax Rules") called upon the Petitioner to attend the  hearing scheduled on 10.05.2016, and simultaneously also issued a  notice   dated   13.04.2016   for   payment   of   Entry   Tax   and   penalty  under Form­3 of the Rules, calling upon the Petitioner to pay an  amount of Rs. 51,38,946/­ towards the Entry Tax assessed for the  years 2011­12 and 2013­14, along with penalty of an amount of Rs.  51,38,946/. That on   18.04.2016, the Petitioner received a notice  dated   13.04.2016   from   the   Respondent   No.   2,   rejecting   the  contentions   of   the   Petitioner   submitted   vide   letter   dated  12.04.2016,   and   further   directed   the   Petitioner   to   deposit   an  amount of Rs. 79,72,386/­ (Entry Tax plus interest) within 10 days. 

Page 5 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT

Hence,   petitioner   has   preferred   present   Special   Civil   Application  No.7844 of 2016 for the aforesaid relief. 

5.0. Heard   Shri   Uchit   Sheth,   learned   advocate   for   the  petitioner of Special Civil Application No. 5379 of 2016 and Shri  S.N.   Soparkar,   learned   Senior   Advocate   for   Singhi   and   Co,  Advocate for the petitioner of Special Civil Application  No.7844 of  2016 and Shri Hardik Vora, learned Assistant Government Pleader  who has appeared on behalf of the respondent State.

6.0. Shri S.N. Soparkar, learned counsel for the petitioner of  Special   Civil   Application     No.7844   of   2016   has   vehemently  submitted   that   impugned   assessment   notice   calling   upon   the  petitioner to   produce relevant data is coupled with the demand  notice   along   with   interest   and   penalty   and   therefore,   same   is  nothing but an empty formality. It is further submitted that even  the respondents have issued a notice for demand and has levied  interest   as   well   as   penalty,   even   without   carrying   out   any  assessment, without affording any opportunity to the petitioner to  make submissions. It is submitted that therefore, the initiation of  proceedings  by  the respondents  is itself erroneous  and unlawful,  and not in accordance with the provisions of the Entry Tax Act and  the Entry Tax Rules.

6.1. It   is   further   submitted   by   Shri   S.N.   Soparkar,   learned  counsel for the petitioner that in terms of the provisions of Section  8 of the Entry Tax Act, no order of assessment can be made after  the   expiry   of   three   years   from   the   last   date   prescribed   for  Page 6 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT furnishing   of   return­cum­challan   of   the   particular   period.   It   is  submitted  that   further     in   view   of   Rule   6   of  the   Entry   Tax,   the  return­cum­challan   is   required   to   be   furnished   to   the   concerned  authority   within   a   period   of   one   month   and   fifteen   days  immediately succeeding the month for which return­cum­challan is  required   to   be   furnished.   It   is   submitted   that   therefore,   the  respondents     could   have   initiated   the   proceedings,   if   any,  demanding Entry Tax from the Petitioner, under the provisions of  the Entry Tax Act, latest by dates hereunder specified:

                                                Period under         Completion 
    Invoice Date            Entry Date
                                                      Rule 6          of 3 years

     29.02.2012             02.04.2012              17.05.2012       17.05.2015

     30.03.2012             23.04.2012              08.06.2012       08.06.2015

     30.09.2014             27.11.2014              11.01.2015       11.01.2018


  It   is   submitted   that   the   impugned   proceedings/   demand  notices are clearly barred by limitation and therefore, liable to be  quashed and set aside on this ground alone. 

6.2. It is further submitted by Shri S.N. Soparkar, learned counsel  for   the   petitioner   that   an   assessment   or   reassessment   under   the  Entry   Tax   Act   can   only   be   made   based   on   a   return­cum­challan  filed   by   the   assessee,   which  return­cum­challan   is  based  on   self­ assessment. It is submitted that in view thereof,  if the assessee is of  the opinion that the goods are not 'Specified Goods' for the purpose  of   the   Entry   Tax   Act,   and   accordingly   no   return­cum­challan   is  filed, there can be no further assessment, reassessment, or levy of  Page 7 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT penalty or interest. It is submitted that therefore, and the petitioner  has not filed return­cum­challan under the Entry Tax Act   as the  goods are not 'Specified Goods', no assessment can be possible in  absence   of   such   return­cum­challan.     In   support   of   his   above  submission, he has relied upon the decision in the case of Standard   Chartered Finance Ltd. v. Commissioner  of Income Tax,  Bangalore,  reported in (2016) 381 ITR 453. It is further submitted by Shri S.N.  Soparkar, learned counsel for the petitioner that the  provisions of  Section 10 of the Entry Tax Act cannot be said to be envisaging a  situation wherein, even though a person is under a bonafide belief  that   the   goods   are   not   'Specified   Goods',   is   required   to   pay   the  Entry Tax. It is submitted that it is settled law that   the liability to  pay   tax   until   filing   of   return   would   be   in   accordance   with   the  assessee's own assessment of his tax liability, and not on the basis  of filing assessment, and that the assessee's own assessment would  include his bonafide claim to any deductions, exemption, or non­ taxability   of   any   turnover   of   sales   or   purchases,   which   will   be  subject to determination by the assessing authority. It is submitted  that thus, the obligation of the Petitioner to pay the Entry Tax until  filing of the return­cum­challan would be entirely on the basis of  self­assessment. In support of his above submission, he has relied  upon the decision in the case of Brooke Bond India Ltd. v. State of   Gujarat, 1998 SCC OnLine Guj : (1999) 113 STC 185.  6.3.  It is further submitted by Shri S.N. Soparkar, learned counsel  for the petitioner that it is  settled law that fiscal statutes are to be  interpreted strictly. It is submitted that further, an assessee cannot  be compelled to pay tax even before an assessment is carried out in  Page 8 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT respect   of   the   assessee's   liability.   It   is   further   submitted   by   Shri  Soparkar, learned counsel for the petitioner that Entry Tax Act does  not   provide   a   mechanism   for   a   situation   where   the   return­cum­ challan is not filed by an entity, more particularly as to how the  authority can compel an entity to file such return­cum­challan after  the expiry of the prescribed period. It is submitted that in  absence  of such a provision, the petitioner cannot be compelled to file the  return­cum­challan at this stage, when the period prescribed under  Rule 6 of the Entry Tax Rules has already lapsed. 

6.4.  It is further submitted by Shri S.N. Soparkar, learned counsel  for the petitioner that the assessee  under the provisions of section  11(1)(a)(iii) of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003, is entitled  to claim tax credit equal to the amount of tax paid under the Entry  Tax Act. It is submitted that in view thereof,  if the provisions of the  Entry   Tax   Act   were   to   be   interpreted   in   a   manner   wherein   the  Respondent authorities are empowered to compel the Petitioner to  file return­cum­challan under the Entry Tax Act after the expiry of  the prescribed period under Rule 6 of the Entry Tax Rules, it would  tantamount   to   depriving   the   petitioner   of   the   opportunity   of  claiming   such   tax   credit   in   respect   of   the   VAT   paid   during   the  corresponding   period.   It   is   submitted   that   such   interpretation  would be very prejudicial and unjust to the petitioner and the same  could not have been the intention of the legislature while drafting  the provisions in question.  It is submitted that therefore, even for  the aforesaid reason, the authorities cannot compel or call upon the  Petitioner to file the return­cum­challan at this stage. 

Page 9 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT

6.5.  It is further submitted by Shri S.N. Soparkar, learned counsel  for the petitioner that even otherwise in terms of the provisions of  Section   17   of   the   Entry   Tax   Act,   it   is   unambiguously   clear   that  penalty   can   only   be   levied   upon   an   assessee   only   after   giving   a  reasonable   opportunity   of   being   heard.   It   is   submitted   that  impugned notices, inasmuch as they have failed to adhere to the  provisions   of   Section   17   of   the   Entry   Tax   Act,   are   illegal   and  unlawful and liable to be quashed. 

  Making   above   submissions   and   relying   upon   the   above  decisions,   it   is   requested   to   allow   the   present   Special   Civil  Application No. 7844 of 2016. 

7.0. Shri   Uchit   Sheth,   learned   advocate   for   the   petitioner   of  Special   Civil   Application   No.   5379   of   2016   has   vehemently  submitted that entry tax is leviable only on entry of specified goods.  It   is   submitted   that  Section   3   of   the   Gujarat   Tax   on   Entry   of  Specified Goods into Local Areas Act, 2001 (herein after referred to  as "the Entry Tax Act") which is the charging section imposes tax  only   on   the   entry   of   "specified   goods".     It   is  submitted   that   the  phrase "specified goods" has been defined under Section 2(k) of the  Entry Tax Act to mean goods specified in column 2 of the Schedule  and  such   other  goods  as  notified  by  the  State   Government.   It  is  submitted that thus,  entry tax is leviable only on entry of specified  goods.   The   rates     of   entry   tax   are   also   prescribed   only   for   such  specified goods.

7.1. It is further submitted by Shri Sheth, learned advocate  for  the petitioner that even returns are required to be filed only if a  Page 10 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT person believes he is liable to pay entry tax. It is submitted that  there is no provision requiring filing of Nil returns. It is submitted  by Shri Sheth, learned advocate for the petitioner that Section 7 of  the Entry Tax Act requires filing of returns by a person liable to pay  tax under the Entry Tax Act. It is submitted that a person is liable  to file returns under the Entry Tax Act only if he bonafidely believes  that he has imported specified goods from outside the State.   It is submitted that Rule   6 of the Entry Tax Rules requires  furnishing of "return­cum­challan" in Form 1 by an importer to the  assessing  authority   within   whose   jurisdiction   the   specified   goods  are brought for consumption, use or sale. It is submitted that even  in   the   prescribed   format   i.e.   Form   1,   the   description   of   the  "specified goods" imported along with value, rate of tax, etc needs  to be filled along with a statement that the tax amount as per such  return has been deposited by the importer. It is submitted that even  return­cum­challan needs to be filed only if a person believes that  he has imported "specified goods" into the State of Gujarat. It is  submitted that there is no   provision requiring persons to file Nil  returns in cases where non­specified goods are imported into the  State of Gujarat.

7.2. It is further submitted by Shri Sheth, learned advocate  for  the petitioner that even there is no provision under the Entry Tax  Act   for   assessment   if   return   is   not   filed   by   an   importer.   It   is  submitted   that   there   is   no   provision   under   the   Entry   Tax   Act  empowering the authorities to call upon a person to file return and  pay   entry   tax   in   a   case   where   such   person   has   not   filed   return  under the Entry Tax Act under a belief that the goods imported by  Page 11 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT him were not specified goods leviable to tax. It is submitted that  Section  8  of  the    Entry Tax Act   allows  assessment  only in  cases  where return­cum­challan is filed by the importer. It is submitted  that therefore, the demand of entry tax from the Petitioner in the  absence   of   any   machinery   provision   under   the   Entry   Tax   Act   to  assess a person who has not filed returns under the Entry Tax Act is  without jurisdiction, bad and illegal.

7.3. In   the   alternatively,   it   is   submitted   by   Shri   Sheth,   learned  advocate for the petitioner that in any case initiation of assessment  proceedings   beyond   the   period   of   3   years,   is   time­barred.   It   is  further submitted by Shri Sheth, learned advocate for the petitioner  that  if it is held that assessment under Section 8 of the Entry Tax  Act can be initiated even against persons such as Petitioner who  have bonafidely not filed return under the Entry Tax Act, then in  any   case   initiation   of   assessment   proceedings   in   the   case   of   the  Petitioner is beyond the stipulated period of 3 years under Section  8(5) of the Entry Tax Act and therefore without jurisdiction, bad  and illegal. 

7.4. It is further submitted that the submission on behalf of the  State Government that the time limit of 3 years is applicable only to  persons   who   have   filed   return   under   the   Entry   Tax   Act   has   no  substance. It is submitted that only provisions for assessment under  the Entry Tax Act are contained in Section 8(3) and 8(4) of the  Entry Tax Act. It is submitted that it is categorically provided in  Section 8(5) of the Entry Tax Act that no assessment order shall be  passed under sub­sections (3) and (4) of the Entry Tax Act after  Page 12 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT expiry   of   3   years   from   the   "last   date   prescribed   for   furnishing  returns of the particular period". It is submitted that thus if at all it  is held that  assessment under Section 8 of the Entry Tax Act can be  initiated   even   for   persons   who   have   not   filed   return   under   the  Entry   Tax   Act,   then   the   time   limit   which   is   stipulated   for  assessment   under   Section   8   of   the   Entry   Tax   Act   would   also   be  applicable   and   therefore   initiation   of   assessment   proceedings   is  beyond   a   period   of   3   years   from   the   last   date   prescribed   for  furnishing   of   returns   is   time­barred,   and   therefore,   without  jurisdiction, bad and illegal. 

7.5. It is further submitted by Shri Uchit Sheth, learned advocate  for the petitioner that even there is no provision for filing nil return  and   hence   time­barring   of   assessment   cannot   be   restricted   to  persons   who   have   filed   returns.   It   is   further   submitted   by   Shri  Sheth, learned advocate for the petitioner that there is no provision  under the  Entry Tax Act requiring or allowing filing of Nil return,  in   a   case   where   a   person   imports   goods   which   he   bonafidely  believes to be non­specified goods. It is submitted that therefore, as  such a person who does not file return under the Entry Tax Act,  under a bonafide belief that the goods brought into the State by  him are not specified goods, then he does not commit breach of any  provision under the Entry Tax Act so as to make the time limit of  assessment under Section 8(5) of the Entry Tax Act inapplicable to  him. 

7.6. It   is   further   submitted   by   Shri   Uchit   Sheth,   learned  advocate for the petitioner that the requirement of filing nil return  Page 13 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT consciously absent in the statute since registered dealer would in  any case be filing returns under the Vat Act. It is submitted that in  fact  the legislature has consciously refrained from requiring filing  of Nil returns under the Entry Tax Act. It is submitted that because  assessing authorities under the Entry Tax Act are appointed under  Section   5   of   the   Entry   Tax   Act.   It   is   submitted   that   as   per   the  Notification dated   13.9.2001 issued under Section 5 of the Entry  Tax   Act,   all   the   authorities   of   Sales   Tax/Vat   are   appointed   as  assessing officers of the Entry Tax Act. It is submitted that  phrase  "Registered dealer" has been defined under Rule 2(c) of the Entry  Tax rules to mean a dealer defined under clause (20) of section 2  of the VAT Act. It is submitted that thus a registered dealer under  the Vat Act is ipso facto a registered dealer for the purpose of the  Entry Tax Rules. It is submitted that Rule  6(2)(b) of the Entry Tax  Rules requires a registered dealer to file return­cum­challan within  a period of 22 days from the end of the month for which return is  required to be furnished. It is submitted that such  period is in pari  materia with Rule 26 of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Rules, 2006  which requires payment of tax under the Vat Act within a period of  22 days from the end of the month. It is submitted that a registered  dealer   under   the   Vat   Act   is   mandatorily   required   to   file   return  under Section 29 of the Vat Act wherein he is required to show all  purchases and sales made including purchases made from outside  the State.  It is submitted that since the entry turnover of purchases  made from outside the State would be shown by a registered dealer  in the returns filed under the Vat Act and the assessing authorities  for the purpose of the Vat Act and the Entry Tax Act are common,  the   Entry   Tax   Rules   require   filing   of   returns   only   if   the   person  Page 14 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT believes that he has imported specified goods. It is submitted that  the requirement of filing nil return under the Entry Tax Act even  though   the   entire   turnover   of   purchases   is  shown   in   the   returns  furnished under the Vat Act would only be duplication, therefore  the   Entry   Tax   rules   consciously   require   filing   of   returns   only   in  cases where the person believes that entry tax is payable  on the  transaction. 

7.7. It   is   submitted   that   in   the   present   case   the   purchase   of  excavator by the Petitioner is recorded in his books of account. The  petitioner is  a registered dealer under the Vat Act. It is submitted  that the petitioner  has even been subjected to scrutiny assessment  under   the   Vat   Act   and   thus   as  such   the   assessing   authority   was  aware   about   the   entry   of   goods   into   the   State   of   Gujarat.   It   is  submitted   that   thus   the   time   limit   of   3   years   stipulated   under  Section   8(5)   of   the   Entry   Tax   Act   would   be   applicable   to   the  Petitioner and thus the assessment proceedings are time barred by  limitation.   It   is   further   submitted   by   Shri   Uchit   Sheth,   learned  advocate   for   the   petitioner   that   even   statutory   notice   for  assessment under Section 8 specifically contains the circumstance  where person has not filed returns.   It is submitted that statutory  notice for assessment in Form 2 which is prescribed for the purpose  of Section 8 of the Entry Tax Act by Rule 7(2) of the Entry Tax  Rules   specifically   contains   a   circumstance   where   person   has   not  filed   returns   and   the   officer   wants   to   make   assessment.   It   is  submitted that thus, the legislature also believes that assessment of  persons   who   has   not   filed   returns   under   the   Entry   Tax   Act   is  required to be made under Section 8 of the Entry Tax Act.  It is  Page 15 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT submitted that in fact  in the case of the Petitioner the very notice  for   assessment   in   Form   2   was   issued   to   the   Petitioner.   It   is  submitted that therefore, in light of   such legal provisions and in  view   of   such   facts,   it   is   not   open   for   the   learned   Respondent  authorities to contend that Section 8 of the Entry Tax Act is not  applicable   to   assessment   of   persons   who   have   not   filed   returns  under the Entry Tax Act. It is submitted that if the   assessment is  under Section 8 of the Entry Tax Act then the time limit for such  assessment   stipulated   under   Section   8(5)   of   the   Entry   Tax   Act  would also be applicable  and   therefore,  the assessment is time­ barred. 

7.8. It is further submitted by Shri Sheth, learned advocate for the  petitioner   that   Entry   Tax   Act   and   the   Vat   Act   are   intricately  connected. It is submitted that Section 4(3) of the Entry Tax Act  provides for reduction of liability under the Vat Act if entry tax is  paid   on   import   of   specified   goods.   It   is   submitted   that  correspondingly   Section   11(1)(c)   of   the   Vat   Act   provides   that   a  dealer would be entitled to input tax credit of the tax paid under  the Entry Tax Act. It is submitted that therefore, determination of  liability under the Entry Tax Act is necessary before determining  liability under the Vat Act. It is submitted that therefore, if a person  believes that he has not imported specified goods and therefore he  does   not   pay   entry   tax   and   if   subsequently   in   assessment   he   is  found liable to entry tax then he would be entitled to credit of such  entry   tax   in   assessment   under   the   Vat   Act.   It   is   submitted   that  therefore, it is imperative that the assessment under the Entry Tax  Act precedes the assessment under the Vat Act. It is submitted that  Page 16 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT therefore,   it   is   for   such   reason   that   while   the   time   limit   for  completion of assessment under Section 8(5) of the Entry Tax Act  is   stipulated   to   be   3   years,   the   time   limit   for   initiation   of  scrutiny/audit assessment under the Vat Act is also stipulated to be  3   years   under   Proviso   to   Section   33(3)   of   the   Vat   Act.   It   is  submitted   that   if   the   assessment   under   the   Entry   Tax   is   not  completed prior to assessment under the Vat Act then this would  lead to an anomalous situation in as much as while a dealer will be  held liable to pay entry tax he would lose his right to be granted  input   tax   credit   under   the   Vat   Act.   It   is   submitted   that   such  situation   could   never   have   been   envisaged   by   the   legislature  particularly in case of a registered dealer under the Vat Act. It is  submitted   that   therefore,   the   respondent   cannot   be   allowed   to  initiate   assessment   under   the   Entry   Tax   Act   after   expiry   of   the  statutory limitation period of 3 years. 

7.9. It is further submitted by Shri Sheth, learned advocate for the  petitioner that even otherwise impugned levy of entry tax at the  rate   of   15%   under   the   Entry   Tax   Act   by   treating   excavators   as  specified   goods   is   bad   in   law   and,   contrary   to   the   scheme   and  object and purpose of Entry Tax Act. It is submitted that excavators  used   in   execution   of   works   contract   were   classifiable   as  "Earthmoving   Equipment"   under   Entry   98A   of   the   Gujarat   Sales  Tax Act, 1969   for which the stipulated rate of tax was 8%.   It is  submitted that after introduction of the Vat Act w.e.f. 1.4.2006 the  Excavators used in execution of works contract are covered under  Entry 35 of the notification issued under Section 5(2) of the Vat Act  at least till the entry was amended on 15.2.2010 and the stipulated  Page 17 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT rate of tax for Entry 35 was 4% during the year in question i.e.  2006­07. It is submitted that aforesaid has been held by this  Court  in the case of State of Gujarat v/s Yantraman Automac Pvt. Ltd  reported in 93 VST 423 (Guj). 

7.10. It is further submitted by Shri Sheth, learned advocate for the  petitioner   that   imposition   of   entry   tax   at   the   rate   of   15%   on  excavators used in execution of works contracts by treating them to  be   "motor   vehicles"   even   though   the   local   rate   of   tax   on   such  excavators was 4% during the year 2006­07 as held by this Court in  the case of Yantraman Automac Pvt. Ltd. (supra) is contrary to the  scheme   and   purpose   of   the   Entry   Tax   Act,   discriminatory   and  violative of Article 304(a) of the Constitution of India as held by  this Court in the case of Tractors and Farm Equipment Ltd (supra).  It is therefore submitted that the impugned order is required to be  quashed and set aside even on merits of the case.  Making above  submissions and relying upon the recent decision of the 9 Judge  Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Jindal Stainless  Ltd. v/s State of Haryana in Civil Appeal No. 3453 of 2002 decided  on 11.11.2016,  it is submitted that even on merits the impugned  demand notice / order is required to be quashed and set aside.    Making   above   submissions   and   relying   upon   the   above  decisions,   it   is   requested   to   quash   and   set   aside   the   impugned  demand  notice   dated  20.2.2016   and  impugned  assessment  order  dated 13.6.2016 passed under the Entry Tax Act as time­barred as  it is passed beyond the period of 3 years prescribed under section 8  of the Entry Tax Act and in any case after an inordinate delay of  more than 9 years, without jurisdiction, bad and illegal and it is  Page 18 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT also prayed to hold that levy of entry tax on excavators at the rate  of   15%   even   though   the   local   rate   of   tax   under   the   Vat   Act   on  excavators during the period in question was 4% is contrary to the  object   and   purpose   of   the   Entry   Tax   Act,   discriminatory   and  violating Article 304(a) of the Constitution of India as held by this  Hon.   Court   in   the   case   of   Tractors   and   Farm   Equipment   Ltd.  (supra). 

8.0. Both these petitions are vehemently opposed by Shri Hardik  Vora, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of  the respondent State Authority. 

8.1. It is vehemently submitted by Shri Vora, learned Assistant  Government   Pleader   that   the   impugned   assessment   /   demand  notices are absolutely in consonance with the scheme of the Entry  Tax Act. It is further submitted by Shri Vora, learned AGP that in  the present case it is admitted that assessee has not filed return as  prescribed   under   Section   8   of   the   Entry   Tax   Act.   It   is   further  submitted that therefore, the assessee cannot take benefit of time  limit prescribed in Section 8(5) of the Act as entire Section 8 is  regarding   assessment   to   be   made   and   consequence   after   filing  return. It is submitted that if the return is not filed, Section 8 would  not be applicable.

8.2. It is further submitted that Entry Tax Officer would not get  idea about entry of goods in the State except on the basis of return  filed. It is submitted that in the case under consideration also on  the basis of information, search/ survey was made and information  regarding   entry   of   vehicles   was   found   out.   It   is   submitted   that  Page 19 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT therefore,   irrespective   of   the   fact   that   whether   the   concerned  importer  who brings  the goods within the State of Gujarat  bona  fide   believes   or   not   whether   the   goods   imported   are   "specified  goods" or not he has to file return as required under Section 8 of  the Entry Tax Act.

8.3. It is submitted that on considering Section 3 and Section  10 of the Act, the liability of entry tax arise at the time of entry of  the goods and it is the duty of every person who brings such goods  into local area to pay tax. It is submitted that accordingly officers  are entitled to issue demand notice. It is submitted that for issue of  such demand notice, no time limit is specified in the Act. In support  of his above submission, Shri Vora, learned AGP has heavily relied  upon   the   decision   of   the   Jharkhand   High   Court   in   the   case   of  Classic Auto mobiles vs. State of Gujarat and the decision of the  Kerala High Court in the case  of A. Kunhikoya Thangal vs. State of  Kerala   and   ors   reported   in   (2007)   6   VST   432   and   in   the   case  reported in 2004(3) KLT 915.

8.4. It is vehemently submitted by Shri Vora, learned Assistant  Government Pleader that Section 8 of the Entry Tax Act stipulates  assessment   after   return   is   filed.   It   is   further   submitted   that   no  power is given to authorities to make assessment in the situation  where no return is filed. It is submitted that in such circumstances,  the   authorities   have   power   to   issue   demand   notice   in   the  circumstances, the tax is liable to be paid at the time of entry of  specified   goods   into   the   State   and   not   paid   by   petitioner.   It   is  submitted   that   as   per   the   scheme   of   entry   tax,   any   dispute  Page 20 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT regarding specified goods may be adjudicated thereafter.

8.5. It is further submitted that there is no bar to issue demand  notice prior to adjudication, if law permits. In support of his above  submission, he has also relied upon Section 210(3) of the Income  Tax Act, 1961 which gives power to the officers to issue demand  notice   at   the   stage   of   determining   advance   tax   without   any  adjudication.

8.6. It is vehemently submitted by Shri Vora, learned Assistant  Government   Pleader   that   from   reading   of   Entry   Tax   Act,   the  possible interpretation is that officer can issue demand notice once  he is of the view that goods entered into territories of State are  specified   goods   and   no   tax   is   paid   thereon.   It   is   submitted   that  dealer can thereafter pay tax and file return. It is submitted that on  the basis of the filed return, assessment would be carried out. It is  submitted   that   at   that   stage   whether   the   goods   are   "specified  goods"   is   required   to  be   charged.   It   is   submitted  that   any   other  interpretation   would   allow   the   dealer   to   escape   from   tax   if   not  caught  for non filing of  return  and  /  or non payment  of  tax.  In  support   of   his   submissions,   Shri   Vora,   learned   AGP   has   heavily  relied   upon   the   decision   in   the   case   of   M.   Pentiah   and   ors   vs.  Muddalal Veeramallappa reported in AIR 1961 SC 1107.   Making   above   submission   and   relying   upon   the   above  decision, it is requested to dismiss the present petitions. 

  

9.0.   Heard   the   learned   advocates   for   the   respective  parties at length.

Page 21 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT

10. So   far   as   Special   Civil   Application   No.   5379   of   2016  preferred   by   the   M/s.   M.H.   Khanusiya   is   concerned,   the  petitioner   has   prayed   for   an   appropriate   writ,   direction  and order quashing and setting aside the impugned notice  dated   20.02.2016   by   which,   the   petitioner   is   called   upon  to   pay   entry   tax   under   the   provisions   of   Entry   Tax   Act.  The   petitioner   also   prayed   to   quash   and   set   aside   the  assessment order dated 13.06.2016.

10.1. So   far   as     Special   Civil   Application   No.   7844   of  2016   preferred   by   the   petitioner   ­Ultratech   Cement  Limited,   the   petitioner   has   challenged   the   impugned  demand notice dated 13.04.2016, by which, the petitioner  is   called   upon   to   pay   entry   tax   with   interest   and   penalty  on three purchases of Hydraulic Excavator.

11. The   impugned   notices   /   orders   of   assessment   (in  Special   Civil   Application   No.   5379   of   2016)   are  challenged   by   the   respective   petitioners   on   the   ground  stated   herein   above   and   mainly   on   the   ground   that   the  impugned  notices  are  barred  by  limitation  provided   under  Section   8(5)   of   the   Entry   Tax   Act   as   well   as   before   the  order   of   assessment   is   passed,   such   a   demand   cum   notice  directing the petitioner to pay entry tax is not permissible  and   is   bad   in   law   and   also   on   the   ground   that   on   the  goods   so   brought   within   the   State   of   Gujarat,   entry   tax   is  not   leviable   as   they   are   not"specified   goods"   and  Page 22 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT therefore,   on   such   goods   they   are   not   liable   to   pay   entry  tax. 

11.1 While   considering   the   issue   involved   in   the  present  petitions,  the  relevant  provisions   of  the  Entry  Tax  Act,   2001   are   required   to   be   referred   to   and   considered,  which are as under:

Section 3: Incidence Tax: 
3(1).Subject   to   the   other   provisions   of   this   Act,   on   and  from   the   1   st   day   of   September,   2001,   there   shall   be   levied   and   collected   on   the   entry of  specified   goods   into  a  local  area,   a   tax   on   the   purchase   value   thereof   at   such   rates   as   may   be   fixed   by   the   State   Government   by   notification   in   the  Official   Gazette,   but   not   exceeding   the   maximum   rates   specified   in   column   4   of   the   Schedule;   and   different   rates   may   be   fixed   for   different   specified goods.
Section  3(3):  The  tax  shall  be   in  addition  to   the   tax   levied   and   collected   as   octroi   by   a   municipal   corporation   of   a   city   constituted   under   the   Bombay   Provincial   Municipal   Corporations   Act,   1949   or   any   other   local   authority,   as   the   case   may   be,   within   its   local area.
Section 4: Reduction in tax liability.
(1)The amount of tax leviable  under this Act shall,   subject to such conditions as may. Be prescribed', be   reduced  to the extent of the amount of tax paid, if   any, under the law relating to Sales Tax as may be in   force   in   any   other   State   or   Union   Territory   by   an   importer   who   had   purchased   the   specified   goods   in  that State.
(2)The   amount   of  tax  leviable   under   this   Act   shall,   subject   to   such   conditions   as   may   be   prescribed',  be   reduced  to   the   extent   of   the   amount   of   tax   to     be     paid,   If   any,   under   the   Central   Sales   Tax,  Act,   1956  on   the   purchase   of   the   specified   goods   in   the   course   of   inter­ Page 23 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT State trade or commerce.

Section   7:   Returns:­   (1)   Every   person   liable   to   pay   tax   under   this   Act   shall   furnish   returns   in   such   from   for   such   period,   by   such   dates,   and   to   such   authority   as   may   be   prescribed.

(2)  If  any  person  liable   to pay tax  under   this   Act,   having   furnished   return   under   sub­ section   (1)   discovers   any   commission   or   incorrect statement therein, he may furnish a   revised   return   before   the   expiry   of   (one   month)   from   the   last   date   prescribed   for   furnishing the original return. 

Section 8: Assessment.

(1)The amount of tax due from a person liable to pay  tax under this Act shall be assessed separately for such   period as may be prescribed.

(2)If  the  Assessing   Authority   is   satisfied   that   the   return furnished by a person liable to pay tax under   this Act  is  correct and complete, he shall  assess  the   amount of  tax  due from the person on  the  basis of  such return (3)If the Assessing Authority is not satisfied  that  the   return furnished by a person liable to pay  tax  under   this   Act   is   correct   and   complete,   and   the   Assessing   Authority thinks it  necessary to require the presence   of the person or the production  of further evidence,   the Assessing Authority shall serve on the person in   prescribed manner a notice' requiring him on a date   and at a place specified therein, either  to attend and   produce or cause to be produced such evidence as is   specified   in the notice.. On  the  date specified in the   notice, or as soon as may be thereafter, the Assessing   Authority   shall,   after   considering   all   the   evidence   which may be produced, assess the amount of tax due   from the person.

(4)If a person fails to comply With the requirements   of  any   notice   issued   under   sub­section   (3),   the   Assessing   Authority   shall   determine   the   purchase   value  Of  tile   specified   goods   under   the   proviso   to  clause  (I) of section  2 and assess to the best of his   judgement, the amount of tax due from him.

(5)No   order   of   assessment   under   sub­section   (3)or   (4)  shall   be   made   after   the   expiry   of   Page 24 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT three   Year$   from   the   last   date   prescribed   for   furnishing   of   returns   of   the   particular   period.   If   for   any   reason,   such   order   is   not   made   within   the   period   aforesaid,   then   the   return   so   furnished   shall   be   deemed   to   have   been   accepted   as   correct   .and   complete   for   assessing the tax due from such person Section 9:Reassessment If,  after  a   person   liable  to  pay  tax  under   this   Act has been assessed under Section  8 for any   period,   the   Assessing   authority   has   reason   to   believe   that   any   purchase   value   or   part   thereof has, in respect of that period, escaped   assessment   ;   or   has   been   under   assessed   or   assessed   at   a   lower   rate,   then   the   Assessing   .Authority   may,   within   five   years  from   the   date   of  the  order   of   assessment   of   the   particular   period,   after   giving   the   person   a   reasonable   opportunity   of   being   heard,   reassess,   to   the   best  Of  his   judgement,   the   tax due from him.

Section 10 .Payment of tax (1)The  tax shall be paid  in the  manner  hereinafter   provided.

(2)A   person   liable   to   pay   the   tax,   shall,   before   furnishing  return   as   required   by   sub­section   (1)   of   section 7, first pay into the Government treasury in   the  prescribed  manner, the  whole  of  the amount of   tax due from him according to such return.

(3)If a person liable to pay the tax furnishes a revised   return in accordance with sub­section (2) of section 7,   and if such revised return shows that the amount of   tax is larger than the amount of tax already paid or   payable.   He   shall   first   pay   into   the   Government   treasury   in   the   prescribed   manner   the   additional   amount of tax according to such revised return. (4)The amount of (I)tax due where return has been   furnished   without   full   payment   thereof,   or   (ii)   difference   in   the   tax   assessed   under   section   8   or   reassessed under section 9 for any period and the sum   already paid by the person in respect of such period,   and (iii)penalty (if any) levied under section 17 shall   be paid by the person into the Government treasury   by such date as may be specified in the notice. Issued   Page 25 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT by the Assessing  Authority for this purpose, being a  date   not   earlier   than   thirty   days   from   the   date   of   service of the notice (5)Any   tax   or   penalty   which   remains   unpaid   after   the  date   specified   in   the   notice   for   payment, shall  be  recoverable   as an   arrear  of   land   revenue,   and   for   that   purpose   all   the   Assessing   Authorities   shall   have   and   exercise   all   the   powers   of   a   Collector   under   the   provisions of the Bombay Land Revenue Code,   1879.

Section 10A : Special mode of recovery (1)   Notwithstanding   contained   anything   contained   in   any   law   or   contract   to   the   contrary,   the   Assessing   Authority   may   at   any   time   or   from   time   to   time,   by   notice   in   writing,   a   copy   of   which   shall   be   forwarded   to   the   importer   at   his   last   known   address,   require:­

(a)   any   person   from   whom   any   amount   of   monies   is   due   or   may   become   due,   to   an   importer   on   whom   notice   has   been   served   under sub­section(1) or 

(b). any   person   who   holds   or   may   subsequently   hold   monies   fro   or   an   account   of   such   importer   to   pay   to   the   Assessing   Authority,   either   forthwith   upon   the   monies   becoming   due   or   being   held   or   within   the   time   specified   in   the   notice   (but   not   before   the   monies   becomes   due   or   is   held   as   aforesaid)   so   much   of   the   monies   as   in   sufficient   to   pay   the   amount   due   by   the   importer   in   respect   of   the   arrears   of   tax   or   penalty   under   this   Act,   or   the   whole   of   the   money   when   it   is   equal   to   or   less   then   the   amount. 

Section 11:Refund of tax The Assessing Authority shall, on an application made   in   such   form   and   within   such   period   as   may   be   prescribed, refund to a person the amount of tax and   penalty, if any, paid by such person in excess of the   amount due from him. The refund may be either by  cash   payment,   or   at   the   option   of   such   person,   by   deduction of such excess from the amount of tax and   penalty, if any due from such person in respect of any  Page 26 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT other period :

Provided  that   the   Assessing   Authority   shall   first   apply   such   excess   towards   the   recovery   of   any   amount   due   in   respect   of   which   a   notice   under   subsection   (4)   of   section   10   has   been   issued,   and   shall   then   refund   the   balance,   if   any,   in   such   manner   as   may   be   prescribed.
Section 17:Penalty (1) If any person liable to pay tax under this Act   fails to comply with any of the provisions of this Act,  then  the  Assessing   Authority may, after  giving  such   person a reasonable opportunity of being heard, by,   order in writing, impose on him, in addition to any   tax payable, a sum by way of penalty not exceeding   twice the amount of tax.
(2) If   the   person   does   not,   without   reasonable   cause,  pay the tax within the time, he is required by   or   under   the   provisions   of   this   Act,   to   pay   it,   the   Assessing Authority may, after giving sllch person a   reasonable   opportunity   of   being   heard,   by   order   in   writing,   impose   upon   him   by   way   of   penalty,   in   addition to the amount of tax and penalty under sub­ section (1), a sum of equal to eighteen per cent per   annum   for   the   period   during   the   time   the   person   continues to make default in the payment of tax.
(3) If   any   person   commits   breach   of   any  rule   punishable  with   penalty,   the   Assessing   Authority   may,   after   giving   such   person   a   reasonable   opportunity   of   being   heard,   by   order   in   writing   impose   upon   him   a   sum   by   way   of   penalty   not   exceeding   the   sum   of   penalty specified in the rule.

Rule 3.Payment of Tax: 

Every importer, ­
(a)   Who   is   not   a   registered   dealer   shall,   within   two   days of entry of specified goods into local area, pay into   a Government Treasury the tax payable under the Act;
(b) who is a registered dealer shall, within a period of   one month and three days immediately succeeding the   month for which return is required to be furnished, pay   into a Government Treasury, the tax due and payable   under the Act.
(c). Notwithstanding   anything   contained  Page 27 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT in this rule, for the goods specified  under entry   at  serial number  12  in   the  Scheduled   appended   to   the   Government   Notification,   Finance   Department   No.   (GHN­20)   GEA­2008/(S­3)  (3)   TH,   Dated   THE   1st   April,   2008,   brought   into   local   area,   an   electronic   operator   referred   to in clause  (d) of rule 2 only shall be liable to   pay   tax.   Such   electronic   operator   shall,   within   two   days   of   entry   of   specified   goods   into   local   area,   pay   into   a   Government   Treasury,   the   tax   due and payable under the Act:
Rule 4.Method of payment of tax and penalty. (1)   Every   payment   of   tax   and   penalty   shall   be   accompanied   by   a   return­cum   chalan   in   Form   I   obtained from a Government Treasury or the Assessing   Authority appointed under section 5 of the Act. (2)   The   payment   made   into   a   Government   Treasury   shall   be   accompanied   by   a   return­ cum­chalan,   in   quadruplicate.   The   copies   marked   "Original"   and   "Duplicate"   shall   be   returned   to   the   importer   duly   receipted,   of   which   the   copy   marked   "Duplicate"   shall   be   submitted   by   the   importer   to   the   Assessing   Authority   in   accordance   with   the   provisions   of   this rule.

Rule 5. Reduction in tax liability.

The amount of tax shall be reduced under sub­sections   (1)   and   (2)   of   section   4   of   the  Act,   subject   to   the   following conditions, namely: ­ (I)The   importer   shall   produce   before   the   Assessing   Authority,­ (a) the purchase invoice, along with a copy   thereof, wherein the amount of tax payable, under the   law   relating   to   Sales   Tax   in   the   State   or   the   Union   Territory or as the case may be, the Central Sales Tax,   was charged by the vendor who is a dealer registered   under such law and who had sold the specified goods to   the importer from that State or, as the case may be, the   Union Territory, or

(b) A declaration, along with a copy thereof, from such   vendor, declaring  inter­alias  that he had included the   amount of such tax in the price charged by him in the   purchase invoice.

(ii)The   importer   shall   furnish   to   the   Assessing   Authority   the   copy   of   the   purchase   invoice   Page 28 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT mentioned   in   clause   (a)   or   as   the   case   may   be,   the copy of the declaration mentioned in clause  

(b).

Rule 6. Return­cum­chalan.

(1)An   importer   shall   furnish   a   return­cum­chalan   in   Form   1,   appended   to   these  rules,   to   the   Assessing   Authority within whose jurisdiction the specified goods   are brought for consumption, use or sale.

(2)An importer, ­

(a) Who is not a registered dealer shall furnish return­ cum­chalan   under   subrule  (1),   within   three   days   of   entry of specified goods into local area, 

(b) Who is a registered dealer shall furnish return­cum­ Chalan under subrule (1), within a period of one month   and fifteen days immediately succeeding the month for   which return­cum­chalan is required to be furnished.

(c).Notwithstanding anything contained in this rule, an   electronic   operator   referred   in   clause   (d)   of   rule   2,   whether registered dealer or not, shall furnish online, a   return   Form   1A   within   a   period   of   seven   days  immediately succeeding the month for which return is   required   to   be   furnished.   Such   importer   shall   also   furnish   the   details   in   Form   AA   within   three   days   of   entry of specified goods into local area."

Provided that the electronic operator, who deposits an   amount equivalent to intimated amount of tax payable   for   the   period   prescribed   as   under,   may   furnish   the   details in Form 1AA for the said month within the time   limit as under: 

       Period         of                                  Time  
       Calender                                           Limit
       Month

       From   day   1st                                   10th day
       to 7th
       From day 8th                                       18th day
       to 15th
       From   day                                         25th day
       16th to 23rd
       From   day                                         3rd   day  
       24th to end of                                     of   next  
       month                                              month



                                  Page 29 of 39
        C/SCA/5379/2016                                                      CAV JUDGMENT



           (3)      An   importer   shall   furnish   revised  
           return­cum­chalan in Form 1.

           Rule 7. Assessment.

(1)The amount of tax due from an importer, ­

(a)   Who   is   not   a   registered   dealer   shall   be   assessed   within three days of entry  of specified goods into local   area,

(b) Who is a registered dealer shall be assessed within a   period   of   three  months   immediately   succeeding   the   month   for   which   return­cum­chalan   is   required   to   be   furnished.

(2)The notice referred to in sub­section (3) of section 8   shall be in Form 2.

(3)Where the tax could not be assessed as per sub­rule   (1),   the   assessment   shall   be  made   by   the   Assessing   Authority in whose jurisdiction the specified goods are   found   or   detected   as   having   been   consumed,   used   or   sold.

(4)The   amount   of   tax   assessed,   as   per   sub­rule   (3)   shall   be   recovered   in   cash   from   the   importer   and   a   receipt   to   that   effect   shall   be   issued.

Rule 8. Notice   for   payment   of   tax   or   penalty.

A   notice   under   section   10   for   payment   of   tax   or penalty shall be in Form 3.

11.2 Return   cum   challan   is   required   to   be   furnished  in Form 1, as under:  

Form ­1(See rules 4 and 6) Return - cum - chalan / Revised return - cum - chalan Name and address of importer :­ PAN No._______________ _______________________________________________________________ Registration no. under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003)  (If any)  _______________________________________________________________ CST Reg. No. (if any) ________________________________________________________________ Page 30 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT Period From : ­  To SR.N Description of  Purchase  Rate   of  Amount   of  Amount   to  Amount of  o. specified goods  value   of  Tax Tax  be reduced  tax  imported specified  under   sub­ (depsoit  goods  section (1)  or)  imported or   (2)   or  payable  Section 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ________________________________________________________________ Total ________________________________________________________________ The   amount   of   tax   as   per   column   no.   7   being   Rs.   __________   _  Rs.  ___________________   (in   words)   paid   in   cash   /chaque   No.   ___   Dated   _____   of  _________ (Bank)_________ (Branch).
The above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date:                                                               Signatures
Place:­                                                           Status of importer
                               FOR USE IN THE TREASURY
Received Rs. ________, Rs (in words) _____________ Date of Entry ______ Chalan No. _______ From Mr./ Ms. ____________________________________________ Address. __________________________________________________ Signature of Treasury officer  or  Bank Officer  or  Assessing Authority  11.3. N otice for assessment is provided under sub rule  (2) of Rule 7 of Rules, 2001, shall be in Form 2, as under :
Form - 2 See sub rule (2) of rule 7 Notice for Assessment To, M/s ------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------­
----------------------------------------------­ Page 31 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT
----------------------------------------------­ WHEREAS desire to satisfy myself that the returns - cum chalan  furnished by   you in respect of the period from to are correct and complete.
AND WHEREAS having effected an entry of specified goods into local area'   during the period from to in respect of which you are liable to pay tax under   the Gujarat Tax on Entry of Specified goods into Local Areas Act, 2001 you   have not furnished by the prescribed date return - cum - chalan in respect of  the said period.
You are hereby directed to attend at (place) at (time) on date and produce or   cause to be  produced any evidence on which you rely in support in the said   returns­cum­chalan and at the same time produce or cause to be produced the   following documents and account and furnish or cause to be furnished the   following information.
1 .
2.
3.

You are also directed to show cause as to why penalty under sub­section (1) of   section   17   of   the   said   Act   in   respect   of   the   period   from   to   should   not   be   imposed upon you.

Place                                                                                          Signature

Date                                                                                        Designation

                                                                              (Seal )


11.4. Notice for payment of tax for penalty as per Rule 8 shall  be in Form 3, as under:

Form - 3 (see rule 8) Notice for payment of tax or penalty To, Page 32 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT You are required to pay the sum of Rs. ____________________as under:
1. Amount of tax unpaid as per return - cum - chalan Rs. _______________
2. Amount of tax assessed for the period from ______________to______________________ Rs.____________
3. Amount of Penalty                                            Rs_______________ You   are   here   by   directed   to  pay   the   outstanding   dues   of  Rs._______________   Rupees (in word) in to the Government Treasury within days from the service of   the notice failing which the same will be recovered as an arrear of Land Revenue.
Date:                                                             Signatures
Place:                                                            Designation


11.5. Considering   the   relevant   provisions   of   the   Entry   Tax   Act,  2011   referred   to   and   reproduced   herein   above   and   as   per   the  scheme of the Act, on and from first day of September 2001, there  shall   be   levied   and   collected   entry   of   specified   goods   into   local  area, a tax on the purchase value thereof at such rates as may be  fixed   by   the   State   Government   by   Notification   in   the   Official  Gazette but not exceeding the maximum rates specified in column  no.3 of schedule. It further provides that such entry tax shall be in  addition to the tax levied and collected, as octroi by a Municipal  Corporations or any other local authority. It also further provides  that amount of tax leviable, shall, subject to such conditions as may  be prescribed, be reduced to the extent of the amount of tax paid, if  any, under the law relating to Sales Tax as may be in force in any  other State or Union Territory by an importer who has purchased  the   specified   goods   in   that   State.   It   also   further   provides   that  amount of tax leviable under the Entry Tax Act, shall, subject to  such conditions as may be prescribed, be reduced to the extent of  the amount of tax paid, if any, under the Central Sales Tax Act Page 33 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT 1956 on the purchase of the specified goods in the course of inter  State trade or commerce. Similar reduction is provided in goods tax  under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act is paid. Section 7 is with  respect to the returns. It provides that every person liable to pay tax  under this Act shall furnish returns in such from, for such period,  by such dates, and to such authority as may be prescribed. At this  stage, it is required to be noted that as per the scheme of the Entry  Tax Act and Rules, 2001 and as per the Rule 3 every importer is  required to first pay the tax due and payable under the Entry Tax  Act along with return in the form of return­cum­challan as per the  Form No.1. If the importer is not registered dealerin that case, is  required   to   pay   tax   within   the   period   of   two   days   of   entry   of  specified goods into local area and if such importer is registered  dealer   in   that   case,   within   a   period   of   21   days   immediately  succeeding the month for which return is required to be furnished. 

That   as   per   the   scheme   of   the   Act   and   Rules   after   return­cum­ challan is filed, thereafter the question with respect to assessment  will   arise   as   provided   under   Section   8.   As   per   sub­section(5)   of  Section 8, no order of assessment under sub­section (3) or (4) shall  be   made   after   the   expiry   of   three   years   from   the   last   date  prescribed   for   furnishing   of   returns   of   the   particular   period.   It  further   provides   that   if   for   any   reason,   such   order   is   not   made  within the period aforesaid, then the return so furnished shall be  deemed   to   have   been   accepted   as   correct   and   complete   for  assessing the tax due from such person. As per the scheme of the  Act and as per Section 10,   a person liable to pay the tax, shall  before furnishing return as required by sub­section(1) of Section 7,  first pay into the Government treasury in the prescribed manner,  Page 34 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT the whole of the amount of tax due from him according to such  return. As observed herein above and as provided under Rule 6 of  the   Rules,   2001,   the   importer   is   required   to   furnish   return   cum  challan in Form 1, within three days of entry of specified goods into  local area in case the importer is not registered dealer and in case  importer is registered dealer shall furnish return cum challan under  said Rule within a period of 21 days. Therefore, the limitation for  assessment as provided under sub­section(5) of Section 8 shall be  three years from the last date prescribed for furnishing the return,  provided the importer has filed the return. In case, the importer has  not filed the return at all, sub­section(5) of Section 8 shall not be  applicable. We are fortified with the aforesaid view by the decision  of   the   Kerala   High   Court   in   the   case   of  A.   Kunhikoya   Thangal  (supra).   The   Kerala   High   Court   in   the   aforesaid   decision   while  considering  pari­materia  provisions   under   the   Kerala   Act   has  specifically observed and held that limitation apply to the cases where  return has been filed by the assessee and the period of limitation not  applicable, where no return is filed by the assessee. 

11.6. Therefore, submission on behalf of the petitioner that impugned  notice and / or assessment order are barred by limitation as provided  under Section 8 of the Act is concerned, cannot be accepted. 

12.0. Now, so far as submission on behalf of the petitioner that  as they were of the opinion and they believed that the goods which  were imported, were not specified goods and therefore,  not liable to  pay  entry  tax  and  therefore,   they   were   required   to   file   return   and  therefore,   did   not   file   the   return   is   concerned,   the   aforesaid  Page 35 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT submission is contrary to the scheme of the Act and Rules as observed  herein above. If the submission on behalf of the petitioner is accepted  in that  case, every importer  would  not  file   return  and  return­cum­  challan and would not be pay tax on the ground that it believes that  goods are not specified goods. As per the scheme of the Act and the  Rules, as soon as goods are imported, the tax shall be paid along with  return and the return­cum­challan in form 1, in which amount to be  reduced under sub­section(2) of Section 4 of Entry Tax Act, 2001 is  also required to be stated   and question whether goods imported is  specified   goods   or   not   are   required   to   be   considered   during   the  assessment, provided return is filed along with tax and the return­ cum­challan in form 1 is filed. 

12.1. Similarly, the submission on behalf of the petitioner that  unless and until assessment order is passed  and the amount of tax is  determined   there   is   no   question   of   making     payment   of   tax   is  concerned, the aforesaid submission is also contrary to the scheme of  the Act and Rules. 

13.0. Now, so far as submission on behalf of the petitioner that  under the provisions of Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, the assessee is  entitled to claim tax credit equal to the amount of tax under the Entry  Tax Act and therefore, the submission on behalf of the petitioner that  if the provisions of Entry Tax Act were to be interpreted in a manner  wherein   the   respondent   authorities   are   empowered   to   compel   the  petitioner to file return cum challan under the Entry Tax Act after the  expiry of prescribed period under Rule 6 of Entry Tax Rules it would  be   tantamount   to    depriving   the   petitioner   of   the   opportunity   of  claiming   such   tax   credit   in   respect   of   the   VAT   paid   during   the  Page 36 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT corresponding period is concerned, still the petitioner can file return­ cum­challan   and   on   payment   of   tax   can   still   get   credit   under   the  provisions   of   Gujarat   Value   Added   Tax   Act,   if   at   all   the   same     is  allowable. Similarly, while filing return­cum­challan and making the  payment of entry tax, the importer shall be entitled to   reduction in  tax liability as provided under Section 4 of the Act. Even in the form 1  there is a specific column with respect to the reduction in tax liability  as per Section 4(1)(2)  of the Act. Therefore, while making payment  of entry tax as demanded, the petitioner shall be entitled to deduction  in tax liability as provided under Section 4 of the Act. In view of the  above and for the reasons stated above, challenge to the impugned  notice / demand cum notice fail. 

14.0. Now, so far as reliance placed upon the decision of the  Hon'ble  Supreme Court in the case of  Standard Chartered Finance Ltd   (supra)  relied  upon by Shri  S.N.   Soparkar,   learned   counsel   for  the  petitioner of Special Civil Application  No.7844 of 2016 is concerned,  at the outset, it is required to be noted that on facts said decision shall  not   be   applicable.   It   appears   that   in   the   case   before   the   Hon'ble  Supreme   Court   the   assessee   have   filed   its   return   for   the   relevant  assessment year but no assessment order was passed and therefore, it  is held that no assessment order is passed there could not be a notice  for re­assessment. 

15.0. Now, so far as submission on behalf of the petitioner of  SCA   No.   7844   of   2016   that   hydraulic   excavator   imported   are   not  "specified goods" is concerned, at the outset, it is required to be noted  that said aspect is required to be considered during the assessment  proceedings,   provided   the   petitioners­   importer   files   return­cum­ Page 37 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT challan   and   respond   to   the   notice   for   assessment.   Therefore,   it   is  observed   that   as   and   when   return   cum   challan   is   filed   along   with  payment   of   tax   demanded,   the   said   aspect   be   considered   in  accordance with law and on its merits, more particularly, said aspect  may   be   considered   during   the   assessment,   provided   the   petitioner  files return cum challan as per the impugned notice. 

16.0. Now,   so   far   as   challenge   to   the   impugned   assessment  order in SCA No. 5379 of 2016 is concerned, it is the case on behalf of  the petitioner that same is in breach of principle of natural justice.  The   notice   for   assessment   has   been   issued   on   08.06.2016   and   the  petitioner was asked to remain present on 09.06.2016. The petitioner  submitted   brief   written   reply   to   the   notice   and   requested   for  adjournment.   However,   learned   AO   has   passed   the   order   on  13.06.2016. The noting   in the assessment order that one Shri   NB  Shah was heard for the petitioner is disputed by the petitioner and it  is specific case on behalf of the petitioner that the said consultant was  not   available   on   that   date.   Be   that   as   it   may,   it   appears   that  assessment   order   dated   13.06.2016   has   been   passed   in   haste   and  therefore, same can be said to be in principles of natural justice as no  sufficient opportunity has been given to the petitioner. Therefore, the  matter is required to be remanded to the appropriate authority to pass  fresh   order   in   accordance   with   law   and   on   merits   after   giving  opportunity to the  petitioner  on  all   aspects,   however  provided  and  subject to first filing the return­cum­challan by the petitioner insofar  as required and on payment of tax first as per the Scheme of the Act.

17.0. In view of the above and for the reasons stated above,  Special Civil Application No. 7844 of 2016 is dismissed with above  Page 38 of 39 C/SCA/5379/2016 CAV JUDGMENT observations and directions. The Special Civil Application No. 5379 of  2016  is hereby partly  allowed   and  the  impugned  assessment   order  dated 13.06.2016 is hereby quashed and set aside with above liberty  and   with   above   observations   and   directions.   Rule   is   discharged   in  Special Civil Application No. 7844 of 2016 and Rule is made partly  absolute to  the aforesaid extent in  Special Civil Application No. 5379  of 2016. No costs. 

sd/­ (M.R. SHAH, J.)  sd/­ (B.N. KARIA, J.) After the order was pronounced, learned advocate appearing  for   the   petitioner   of   Special   Civil   Application   No.7844/2016   has  requested to continue the ad­interim relief granted vide order dated  06.05.2016   which   was   continued   during   the   pendency   of   the  petition,   so   as   to   enable   the   petitioner   to   approach   the   Hon'ble  Supreme Court and obtain appropriate order. Considering the fact  that vide order dated 06.05.2016, the Division Bench has granted  the ad­interim relief, and the same has been continued till date, the  ad­interim   relief   granted   earlier   vide   order   dated   06.05.2016   is  hereby ordered to be continued upto 15.07.2018.

sd/­ (M.R. SHAH, J.)  sd/­ (B.N. KARIA, J.)  Kaushik Page 39 of 39